TypeaTerminator vs. NedoSkynet Let's start with the potentially pleasurable. Not for everyone, of course, and hardly for most moviegoers, but at least for wrestling fans in particular. So from the cast: you know who John Hennigan is (aka John Morrison from WWE, aka Johnny Mundo from Lucha Underground). You don't know? Then you can safely skip this miscarriage of Skynet's concept. Well, except that you still watch TV in between as a meaningless background.
Because in addition to the interest “How did a familiar wrestler play outside the ring?” to boast of this project nothing. After all, it seems that the girl in the lead role (Yves Mauro) is quite cute, and the tick in the column “see everything that was shot about the mad supercomputer” will not be empty now, but the further you look, the more you realize that it is better not expected initially (the film is straight for TV), and is not expected.
The plot, clearly inspired by the notorious brainchild of James Cameron (and the further into the script, the more clearly), once again teaches that the first line in the new computer program (in this case, called "Echelon") to control everything and everything should be "Do not kill all people." Otherwise, there will be Armageddon, but since the idea of “global kick-ass through nuclear weapons” has already been played out, then we will take a weapon for weather control (which on TV in such films was already, by the way, just as bad), draw cheap special effects (they, by the way, were also – where without a rotating cylinder with a beam in orbit) and call this dull spectacle “Stormageddon”. This is how the project was born.
It remains to recruit strangers for the main roles, to call someone whom the audience recognizes in the trailer, but who is not invited to shoot anywhere else and therefore he will still have to play (in this case it will be Adrian Paul) and wrap it in a pile of monoplane run-decipher-raid (locations change, but the content alas not). Think about why a superprogram with all its superpotential can not resist two people, where did its superhenches come from and how it itself is not morally outdated for twenty years, i.e. to include rational thinking while watching is not recommended, or it will become very sad.
It’s just as sad as the predictability of the finale in particular and everything that came before it. And finally, I want to remake the afterword before the closing credits of the film (quoted by Aristotle) in the phrase: “What we can see ... you can also not look.” To describe the impressions of this picture, it is appropriate.