I remember that year I sat down to watch with the worst expectations. The idea to make a solyak with a bunch of old characters seemed too vintage, pretentious and in general absurd. Formal mockery of the classics. These are the heroes of more or less serious books and films. Each of them has its own world, ideas, and most importantly,
more
I remember that year I sat down to watch with the worst expectations. The idea to make a solyak with a bunch of old characters seemed too vintage, pretentious and in general absurd. Formal mockery of the classics. These are the heroes of more or less serious books and films. Each of them has its own world, ideas, and most importantly, its own authors. This is something we should never forget. Each work and each hero already has an author, and the second one is not needed. So I appeal to anyone who writes something. Paws off! Yeah? Think of your hero, your story, and write it. That's exactly what those authors did. But no, someone had to take it all, put it in a pile and make money off it. Nevertheless, we must pay tribute - this hooliganism was done quite qualitatively and interestingly. That is the last point it differs from the original works, which contain all these vaunted cultural values, but reading them is mortal boredom. And here's hop. Got attention, danced the theater. Yes, everything was twisted, but it so happened that initially the bad idea worked. Well, yes, the film was not born with a knuckle, but is a film adaptation of a strange bearded comic book. Here everyone must decide for himself whether he accepts the hooligan nature of the whole idea, and if so, then we can say that the film turned out not bad, it does not get into the eyes of film sins, it is made exactly, it is still a film of the era when first worked, and then shared money, and not vice versa. In general, in my attitude to the film, I was at a crossroads and forced to put an average assessment: initially the crappy idea, but it so happened that it worked on conscience.
|