- Lisa has been dealing with dangerous people for a long time, but she doesn’t know the basic thing – you can’t take a weapon with your bare hands, you leave prints.
- She keeps a CD of dirt on her rapist even after he's been killed. Why? .
- She asks Blomkvist to find Salashenko, who through a long search finds out that this is her father. She could have said that right away!
- The heroine is charged with 3 murders. No one knows that her guardian was her rapist, the papers show that he left the best reviews about her, then who could suspect her??? But at least she was familiar with him, but how she was soldered by a couple of journalists is generally absurd.
- She and Bloomquist don’t even see each other – why is she running away from the only person she trusts? ?
- Bandits rummaging through a house, leaving, hanging out for half a day, and then going back to burn the house down. . .
The first film I put 7 points, there was a very competent detective, the story of a maniac and victims, psychology, religion, the theme of misogynists, Nazism. And this is just some nonsense... Twice the scene is repeated with the appearance of a positive heroine in a raided apartment. Many times, cars and motorcycles of one character drive up to the place at the moment when the opposing character is busy there. A whole bunch of dead bodies with no clear motive. If the authors themselves knew why Lisa’s father organized such a number of senseless murders, they could not clearly convey it to the viewer. But I am inclined to the version that they simply had no idea what they were shooting. Someone can say that this is a film adaptation of the book and all questions to the author, so – almost any film is a film adaptation of the book, almost always there are holes that need to be patched. The director of the film is free to arrange the plot in his own way, make it more twisted and / or more understandable. It's where everyone worked, down their sleeves. For most of the film, I didn’t understand what I was watching, although (sorry for being indiscreet) I consider myself a smart person. Some senseless set of abandoned corpses, cars arriving on time and a cunning plan that is completely incomprehensible and which the authors will probably take with them to hell. The ending is absent, instead the film just once, and ends.
In conclusion, while watching, I had doubts – maybe it’s not a bad movie, and I don’t understand something. But when the heroine was shot with 3 shots and buried with earth without any coffin - attention - at night, and then she dug out on her own in the morning, I finally realized that I was watching the nonsense of madmen. Because only a zombie is capable of this, not a real person who needs at least breathing.