A lot of people, if you say that you didn’t like the movie, will conclude that you didn’t understand it. I didn't understand him. That is, the basic concept, I quickly grasped. But... Why is Washingtonon’s character so obsessed with the main character? I really thought Pattinson was her son, and this idea would be developed. Why is the main character so cardboard? Why are we told that the past can be influenced by bookmarks when there are heroes from the future in the present? Time travel is a much more complex and terrifying concept than the primitive idea of the big bomb. And the main antihero is a song, motivation on a level: my wife does not love me, you have to kill the whole world. So the dude who suffers the most from losing the love of his beloved wife, given the opportunity to travel back in time, lays a bomb? Makes sense! And who in the future controls it? This is emphasized many times, but will not explain the cause-and-effect relationship. Why is everyone on the antihero team so supportive of his madness? Why do you think one of the main characters will die? What brings us to this other than the rattle on his backpack? This film clearly shows that Nolan is now a master on the level of Shyamalan and Zack Snyder. Even in their overrated company with each new film, more Villeneuve. In all films, “that twist” is more important than any common sense. P. S. And why the hell aren't the drivers of a stolen truck picking up their cell phones and calling to say they've been attacked? Because Nolan forgot there are cell phones and street cameras in 2020?
|