The inseparable continuation of the cartoon “The Birth of Eros” is so inseparable that it is unclear why they were even torn. There could be one cartoon lasting 17 minutes, but it was divided into two. 10. Yeah, that's the arithmetic, because 3 minutes is completely repeated. This in itself is a hack, but in the cartoon there are other
more
The inseparable continuation of the cartoon “The Birth of Eros” is so inseparable that it is unclear why they were even torn. There could be one cartoon lasting 17 minutes, but it was divided into two. 10. Yeah, that's the arithmetic, because 3 minutes is completely repeated. This in itself is a hack, but in the cartoon there are other unpleasant details: - Aphrodite has the voice of an old woman. Erot has the voice of a pig. - On Daphne, there's a piece of clothing, no. - The authors filled the unpainted fragments of the cartoon with just a standing frame (Apollo and Daphne with their backs). Twice, 8 seconds. Same thing. There are many other standing frames of shorter duration. - To escape the mortal warrior from Apollo, the authors decided to spend 4 frames. In general, the obvious lack of frames, their repetition, the terrible unevenness of the study of different fragments leave the impression that this is not a ready-made cartoon, but a kind of working material that is at the stage of 2/3 readiness. As for the content, it is very little. Why? Because this was not done for content, Greek plots are just a convenient excuse for nudity. The authors decided to use antique themes for the first erotic cartoons in the Soviet space as a quite decent starting point. Well, the attempt is not bad, but with such implementation it remained exactly an attempt.
|