Exciting. For me, this is the first criterion. And he's 90 percent done here. Why does it not reach 5 points, perhaps due to excessive bloodshed, without which it is quite possible to do. Probably, the demonstrated method of gutting a person is most convenient for getting rid of his insides for culinary purposes and saves time, but
more
Exciting. For me, this is the first criterion. And he's 90 percent done here. Why does it not reach 5 points, perhaps due to excessive bloodshed, without which it is quite possible to do. Probably, the demonstrated method of gutting a person is most convenient for getting rid of his insides for culinary purposes and saves time, but this action does not add any meaning to the picture. With such brutality of the savages, it is not clear how the prisoners remained intact. This, and a number of other inconsistencies, makes the history of realism somewhat irrelevant. "" I guess that doesn't get you above 4.
|