The cartoon is completely secondary. It's all blended into Epic 3d and Arthur and the Miniputes, the same world, character design, the same radical division into good fairies and black-and-black villains. Also, a lot was stolen from “Maleficent” – as many as two characters who were disappointed in love, and therefore engaged in war.
more
The cartoon is completely secondary. It's all blended into Epic 3d and Arthur and the Miniputes, the same world, character design, the same radical division into good fairies and black-and-black villains. Also, a lot was stolen from “Maleficent” – as many as two characters who were disappointed in love, and therefore engaged in war. The furry animal is extremely reminiscent of the squirrel Skrat from the "Ice Age", runs after the elixir, like that for nuts. The plot is predictable, after 6 minutes I realized who will become a couple and who will become a villain. There is at least one extra character, the younger princess. Her “extra love” in the plot does not act out the conflict, but only interferes with the main line, with minor changes it could be removed from the plot, and it would only turn out better. The Swamp Tsar laments that he cannot be loved even with a bewitching potion, although earlier this evening exactly this happened. Heroes had time to love each other out of the blue - I don't believe. And the main blunder - true love is a protection against love spells, but for some reason the love spell initially does not work, and the younger princess worked. At the end of the animals affected by love spells, the authors decided not to heal at all - let fly-eaters and all sorts of rats love each other. In general, a very strange cartoon, made beautifully, the characters have a good communication, gestures, angles, but at the level of the script it is an unprofessional ballad.
|