Every 10 minutes, the film shows the scene as a joint of journalists like chickens running after the characters, nuisance interviews, and they every time arrogantly walk past, no answer. It’s not even a question of what their morals are in Sweden, that it’s normal for journalists to be treated like shit, but I wonder why the characters don’t take the opportunity to tell the public how it was, and thus get support in a complex case. Idiots. Now to the point.
After the chic first part was a completely worthless second, where the heroine in the most incredible way hang the murder of people whom she did not even know and was not there, there she finds her father - a secret agent who in another country had nothing more to do than beat his wife and attract attention, the heroine has a brother-terminaft who kills her rapist (not knowing about it, but just so), and then almost kills her herself, having no reason for this, and she rises from the grave of aki zombies ... Do you understand the nonsense I have to tell you?
This happens often - after a strong film, the slag-continuation is removed, but then a third part appears, which wins back some positions. I was counting on it. Well mistaken, sometimes, the third part was not even a separate film, and stretching the timing of the second - just think - up to 5 hours. Timekeeping series, only boring and completely unscrewed. Again, some senseless murders, a bunch of "who are all these people" characters, misogyny. Old robbers, who, breathing on incense, try to simultaneously sue the main characters, and publicly intimidate, and quietly remove... Guys, pick one. Their identities are revealed from the beginning, completely destroying the detective. Blonde Terminafter generally wanders around the film back and forth, trying to find something to do and not understanding why he is needed here. Let me kill a fisherman with a brick, for he has settled here. He leaves behind a mountain of corpses completely uninterrupted people, like a bad player in the GTA - why? From this, one could develop the image of an unmotivated Munchkin killer, but the authors did not even do this, his murders are not played out, they are given a few seconds of screen time. Lisa's doctor is an exact replica of a rapist guardian with the same appearance and the same behavior, this is called self-plagiarism. The trial is long, tedious, ineffectual (for comparison, the exemplary saturated scenes of the court were in the film “The Devil’s Advocate”), at the trial the viewer is told exactly the same thing for the 5th time that he already knows. Why again? The heroine several times can not answer the question of the Prosecutor why she went to meet with the father-maniac – she can not do this primarily because the author himself has no idea. The court doesn't believe she defended herself - 3 fucking bullets were pulled out of her! Showing a recording of her rape by one person as an argument that she didn't kill another person - where's the connection? With this record, she would instantly be charged with the murder of her guardian - he was killed on a gun, he has already left prints for childhood stupidity, and now there is a motive, people are not protected by such material, but imprisoned. In short, quiet terror. An incredibly long, incoherent thing with a bunch of meaningless characters. This is an exemplary example of untwisted, poorly written plot and disgusting directing, this film can be disassembled at the film institute to show how not to shoot. In the first part, I had to finish everything, I regret that I watched the sequels.
The only thing that is right in the film is playing around with the police’s approach of “my police take care of me” and “kill me, then come.” Every time positive heroes turn to cops, they scratch their asses, and when they start defending themselves, they get put in jail. This is true, but the authors did not play it.
