The film, which from someone’s light hand got the nickname “Thanks for not in 3d”. I postponed it for a long time and frankly did not want to watch it, because I am not a fan of Russian films at all, and I do not belong to the Vysotsky generation at all. I also knew that many people did not like the film, that it was sawed down by
more
The film, which from someone’s light hand got the nickname “Thanks for not in 3d”. I postponed it for a long time and frankly did not want to watch it, because I am not a fan of Russian films at all, and I do not belong to the Vysotsky generation at all. I also knew that many people did not like the film, that it was sawed down by critics and most of the close artists. On the Internet, Bezrukov was impossibly harassed for playing Vysotsky - as if he had done something truly terrible. I cannot accept or share any of this negativity. It's a great movie. All the arguments against him, which I have not been lazy to read, are either ridiculous or biased. Famous and respected people resent the film for: - removed They didn’t make it like they would if they could make movies. - Vysotsky is not real, but actually Bezrukov The script was written by my son. There is no respect for the great Do you understand? Delusions of envious and not very sane people. How did they not pay tribute when the film was made? It's not a tribute?! Vysotsky was not ashamed by any shot, in every scene he behaves confidently, directly and honestly, looks death in the eyes and never stirred. The general complaint of the film is that it was shown as a drug addict - so forgive me the truth! You shouldn’t have shot, then it wouldn’t be in the movie. But even this is shown with dignity, without black. The claim that makeup was created on the basis of a death mask – so she was forced to do? For those who do not know what a death mask is, it is a very rare procedure, it seems to happen. A cast is taken from the face of the deceased and, according to ancient tradition, this is done as a working material for sculptures and other people of art who want to work on the image of the deceased. You mean understand? The mask is made exactly for what was done in the film. Who do you have to be to roll a barrel on this? Yes, there are a couple of things that I didn’t really like – for example, the main role in the film is not in Vysotsky, but in the KGB colonel. But anyway, it’s a good character, it was interesting to watch him. Vysotsky’s girlfriend is played by Akinshina – a good actress, but a bad person, since the age of 14 she slept with a sweaty smelly Cord, in films she always plays ass and prostitutes, and then suddenly an honest Soviet woman. Playing well, no complaints, just hard to abstract from her reputation. But that's okay, it's really little things. The film is a very high-quality, stunningly recreated image of the Soviet era - how did they even manage to remove all advertising from the streets? All this neon shushara, which I believe should not be, as there should be banners on the Internet. Apparently computer work, because in a real city so much from the streets to shoot would hardly give. The film has a beautiful work with lighting, these sparkling highlights, flashes of light, the sky. It's fascinating. And the ending is cathartic.
|