Characters who use superpowers for robbery, riots and street battles with police are called what? That's right, supervillains. After we have established who the Bobrovs are, we can proceed to a detailed consideration of another example of why Russian cinema is a slag and will remain so for a long time:
- The authors laugh at death and resurrection, at old age, at hanging. For this alone, you can put a negative assessment.
- There are many characters with different abilities. Are they used in the story? Only invisibility and power were useful, and everyone else at least somehow crammed into the frame, although the plot simply does not provide for their use. So maybe it was worth reducing the number of characters from the beginning and not suffering?
- Cardboard antiheroes in the face of bandits. They've already given the characters a week to look for money, a week hasn't gone by yet. So why the hell do they keep tracking Oleg down and attacking him? Zero, exactly zero point.
- Beating a man on the stage in front of the audience. Are you crazy? Did you really take that?
- Someone could enjoy the scene with a naked Akinshina. You can relax, this is the body of the understudy. How do you know that? There is not a single frame where her naked nature and her face are simultaneously visible. It’s also a completely wild scene for a movie that’s marketed as family.
- Bad script. Events are completely amorphous, do not develop from less to more, go in circles, the tension does not increase. Characters do not go through a chain of events, do not face something unexpected, they dullly blonde back and forth and do what they can to stretch the duration.
- The most important aspect of the film is antipsychology. Characters must evolve (change their attitude to what is happening from A to B and C) or not develop to the extreme. But the Beavers spontaneously change their minds about the same issues 10 times in a round-trip movie. The father of the family once set fire to a car richer out of envy, but he does not want to rob a bank to save his father-in-law. It is morning and he is determined to do so. In this family, everyone’s desire is the law. Therefore, the whole family laughs at the dream of Ira about the theater, the whole family spits on the desire of his grandfather to die, the whole family forgets about the desire of his son to join the army. The Beavers intend to pull off a robbery, for which it is necessary not to fire forces, but they do it without the slightest need in front of the director of the theater. Why? Oleg intends to leave his family, he is stunned, tied up and left with force. Oleg wants to stay, he's kicked out. Light was persuaded to rob, she went on it with enthusiasm, but then immediately wants to return the money. Knowing her husband would be killed. The family said goodbye to their grandfather. The family immediately wants to redeem him and resurrect him. The family surrendered to the bench, the family immediately arranges a bloody escape with a bunch of killed cops. It doesn't make any sense.
Over. No script, no character development, no morals. Rob your job, kill cops, send a 10-year-old family out on a date with a 40-year-old. Characters are idiots, each in their own way. They set up three innocent drunkards, who then rotted on the bunks, defeated the city. Their relationship in the family was ugly, and remained. A mockery of family values, human rights, heroes, death, childhood. Don't watch anyone.
P.S. The ship carrying a family of freaks in a container was supposed to be called the Toe Head. The joke will be understood by those who play superheroes.