Sack, Virginia, Sack! This phrase really sets in the beginning of the film and at the same time reflects what the hero (jumping) and the film itself (sucking) are doing.
I thought I'd die of boredom. A two-hour movie I've watched for maybe 6 hours. He doesn't hold it to that degree. Yeah, a book movie. Based on a ridiculous 1911 American book. If this comedy was shot in the 60s (there were some opportunities, but there was still interest), it would become the same basis for half of cinema as Star Trek and Star Wars. But the film was born 50 years later than the appropriate era and a century after writing, so it was no longer needed. Yes, of course, there are older works that are still in demand. But that's not one of them.
The studio invested fabulous money and burned out. No wonder. The swindler, the swindler and the swindler escapes from the Indians and gets to Mars, there he discovers the ability to jump to the height of the skyscraper (although the gravity there is only 60% of the earth, and not 0.001%), falls on the division of children by unpleasant Martians, hand-to-hand destroys half of the enemy fleet, an army of ferocious savages (like Neo Smiths), two six-legged mammoth gorillas, an evil leader and an air cruiser – and all this to stop the bald deities who were in the Virgin, who did not give the blue one to the princess.
I didn’t know where the 250 million was. Even the stinking Fascist Star Trooper was shot for $100 million in bearded years, and it looks much bigger, and its visual impressions definitely look like their money. What is it? A tale of a wandering team in a pseudo-peplum setting... Well, some individual scenes were probably not bad, but all together it does not fit and is perceived very poorly and unconvincing. It's like people in the 21st century are trying to sell the "Big Lunar Cheat" from the 19th century.