We all know Nikita Dzhigurda - the main eccentric of the domestic show business. Personally, I first saw him in 2008, when he participated in the Last Hero and dropped out at the very beginning. Then followed: the filming of childbirth, filming sex with Anisimova, a video for Gangam Style, divorce from his wife, etc. But as it turned out, in 1993 he also made his own film, where one title says a lot - "Superman involuntarily or Erotic Mutant" and from this film it is clear that Dzhigurda has always been abnormal! Impressions from the film are such – it’s just a ridiculous, scorching thrashack, which was not planned this way.
Plot. Sorry, God, there's a bit of a plot. Dzhigurda plays engineer Anatoly, who, along with his girlfriend, tries to get money to implement his invention (which one, don’t ask), and they get involved in a showdown with the police and the mafia. It doesn't matter, though. Because the plot here is absolutely secondary, it falls out of the narrative, and most of the film is about copulation Dzhigurda. Seriously, despite the fact that the film is barely an hour, 20 minutes in it take scenes where Dzhigurda has sex with his faithful, in all unthinkable poses, to his songs; scenes where Dzhigurda bathes and sunbathes, to his poems. And if you think that this somehow affects the history, then no, Dzhigurda just does it.
The technical part of the film is “at height”. The 1990s, after all, so the film was shot on a disgusting camera with dirty color correction. The installation deserves special attention. Each scene is divided by inserts where a glass is broken. Get ready for the magic glue. Here Dzhigurda talks with his father at the country house, the next shot and someone tortures him in some dark place. Here Dzhigurda discusses, in the barn, the construction of a hang-glider and here we are shown how some bandits in some other barn rape for some reason, some woman and then Dzhigurda appears. What is he doing there, how did he get there, who is this woman? Don't ask. Here is Dzhigurda running down the street, the next frame, he is already in the car.
The story itself to discuss stupid and ungrateful, but still. Why Dzhigurda is preparing to kill the murderers, then immediately drifts. Then why did you prepare? And of course, the most “genius” escape plan in history: Batumi-deltoplane-Turkey! It's so stupid that there's no comment.
Matt. I can't help but mention him because he's one of the heroes of the movie. The entire film consists of a five-story mat. To make it clear how important the mat is here, the film begins with the fact that some security guard escorts Dzhigurda out with the phrase "A dickhead castrated ... if you're a ox-producer." All the characters are constantly matyuka, and in combination with the golden quotes of Dzhigurda, the film turns into an endless rye storehouse of epic quotes for all occasions:
Sell the invention? Or we'll cut your eggs off.
- Good night, kids. I'm going to need my eggs.
Do you have any stains?
Do you know the difference between a penis and life? Life is tougher.
Take the present. Go to the battering ram.
And the phrase that made me fall under the table.
Pavlik, what did you drop there?
- Your eggs.
Action. In addition to mat, the film consists of cool, epic fights Dzhigurda with everyone in a row. Technically, the fights are made lousy, forever in dark colors and with ragged editing, because of which you can not see exactly how the heroes fight. But the fights themselves are something with something, they are so cruel, natural that they are even funny. Seriously, I'm not always as impressed with fights in Hollywood action movies as I am here. Especially the scene of the fight in the barn, coupled with quotes from Dzhigurda, it turns into a carbon monoxide messivo.
Conclusion: For a very long time I didn’t know how to relate to this film, which review to put: green, but with a score of 1 or red, but with a score of 10. To call the creation of Dzhigurda a film is to insult the whole cinema: an absurd plot, disgusting editing, poor shooting, constant motherhood and most importantly, all this is in full seriousness.
But on the other hand, the film is incredibly rusty. Dzhigurda did not plan to do this, it can be seen, he probably shot a film about the hero-romantic rebel in the style of Danila Bagrov, but it turned out exactly that funny. "Superman involuntarily" reminds Wiso's Room or Nevsky's fighters, this film is so ridiculous and disgusting, coupled with cool swear words and quotes of Dzhigurda, which is rusty. I got more pleasure from the independent film Dzhigurdy than from all high-quality Russian films of the Cinema Foundation. I advise everyone to watch this film in a cheerful company with beer, the mood will be a few days ahead.
To be honest, I even regret that Dzhigurda will never direct a sequel. Superman in captivity could be our thrash, like Rodriguez's Machete, but alas, it won't.
To be honest, I watched the film only in the review of Evgeny Bazhenov. I tried to watch the film completely, so bored and without Eugen’s comments, it’s like without any highlight. But the review was enough to make an opinion.
The film “Superman involuntarily” is of course a terrible thrashak, consisting of a five-story mat, songs and poems of Dzhigurda, countless sexual acts of Dzhigurda and his girlfriend, rapes, gopniks and other charms of the 90s. And of course, with poor quality shooting.
But, for God’s sake, I was just playing the movie.
And the scene of a fight in the barn is generally something with something, I advise everyone to watch, you will be harassed for a very long time.
But if you forget about mate, the film is even in some ways good, and Dzhigurdu can be called a hero of that time, because the 90s are in the yard, and with them lawlessness, crime, corrupt police, and Dzhigurda solves these problems the only possible way of that time; fights, shootouts. That's the only way to survive. If you remember the films "Brother", "Brother", "Voroshilov Shooter", "Boomer", "b" then the main characters also lived in the 90s and also reigned justice, and solved problems with the help of weapons and other not quite legal ways. In this regard, Dzhigurda even stands on a par with Danila Bagrov.
Conclusion: "Superman involuntarily or Erotic Mutant" is of course a fierce thrash, but what a funny thing it is, and if you look at the review from Bad, then generally good mood from the film is provided. The film is even an order of magnitude funnier than many modern Russian comedies shot on the money of the Cinema Foundation. I sincerely regret that Dzhigurda did not remove the sequel, I think the continuation would be no worse.
This film can be characterized simply - Russian cheap thrash of the 90s, which then was in bulk. And it's hard to call it a movie. The director of the film is the king of love of the 21st century, aka Nikita Dzhigurda. In this film, he plays 2 roles and wrote the script. And the cast is familiar, I will talk about it later.
It's actually quite a movie. At the time, he might have looked very funny. Dialogues that, at the level of the film, showed the character of the hero Nikita and the rest of the characters, caused laughter and increased self-esteem. Now they evoke a wild facepalm and sometimes laugh out of illogicality. The plot in the film is also quite inadequate and does not try to develop. Although for that time it was not very noticeable. The installation here is the same as the plot, crooked and incomprehensible. It seems that at that time the computer did not pull a normal program for editing and in the maker threw fragments of the film, which makes it seem that you are watching a set of frames with curved flashbacks and with a very medium action, which is not enough here. But Nikitka was not lazy to make scenes with the violence of his girlfriend for 10 minutes to his songs. It causes boredom and wild laughter. I also saw slow-mo, the fact that the girl’s hair color changes and the eternal conversation about the male organs, which are so popular with our hero.
But! Despite the fact that I already scolded the film, I want to say that I liked a couple of things. For example, the actors are familiar, and they play. Even Jigurda tries to play, and he does it by 2.5 out of 5. But again, due to the dialogue, the words about the game are not appropriate here. Also quotes like the difference between "genital and life" and "good night, kids" were funny. The film is the USSR, and it can even be forgiven for a weak action and a small budget.
Outcome: For that time - a passing and funny action movie that can be watched for the sake of harp dialogue and slightly aged actors. In our time, a trash thrash that deserves no attention. And if you look - again for the sake of illogical dialogue and quotes.
For the 90s, 4 out of 10, now 2 out of 10.
Good night, kids!
I'll still need my eggs. Superman involuntarily, or Erotic Mutant
First you need to try to tell the story of the film. I didn’t really understand that nonsense. Dzhigurdishka sort of works as an engineer and makes some grand discovery. His project (which is supposed to save the whole world) is being bought by local bandits, because Dzhigurday himself cannot implement it. He has no money, but he has a girlfriend. She decides to help Dzhigurdenka with the money in one very interesting way. Her brother was killed, so you just have to go to the debtors and take their cabbage. Dzhigurdeika refuses, but a friend with some gopniks decides to collect a tribute for her erotic mutant.
I’ve been watching this movie for a long time, but I just decided to watch it. After watching, there was only one thought in my head, and Tigran Keosayan generally knows where his wife played in her youth! I climbed into the filmography of Khmelnitskaya, and they are already divorced (op Dzhigurda), but God is with them. By the way, in the credits, we are warned that in all the erotic (love and stronger) scenes, a completely different actress plays. Yes, there are a lot of erotic scenes in the film, or rather a couple of them, but Jigurdeyman stretched them to indecency. It's not pornography, but it looks on edge. The movie only lasts one hour, because it’s not a movie. If you cut all the lust of Dzhigurdin, you get a short film for forty minutes.
The film is so bad that some people defended it because it is supposedly very funny. Of course, and how not to laugh at such an exorbitant thrash, but Dzhigurdishvili did not shoot a comedy. He made a movie about himself (I am normal, brilliant and sexy). This is one hundred percent PR with elements of post-Soviet black. I'm fine with Dzhigurdidze, but I won't justify the film. Terrible directing and just incredibly disgusting editing. At first, Jigurden is sitting in a car, and a second later he is beaten in a shed. What? Why? It's a nightmare. And the hero still knows how to teleport. There is a scene where gangsters rape a girl, but suddenly the door opens, and then Jigurdish. How did he find them? Genius!
In the second half, the film looks a little better, but still smells like some amateur activity. Jigurdon reads his own poems and sings songs in a hoarse voice. And there is also a lot of tangy mat, but the most fun scenes with muzzle and chase. Steven Seagal is resting. Thanks to this film, I learned a lot that Nikita Dzhigurda is very good at having sex (the main thing is not size), is profanity and in general is the best man in the world. That is, the film is very intellectual and instructive. And seriously, Dzhigurdinator really knows how to laugh at himself, unlike Shurik Nevsky, but they are also directors. And very sorry for Yakovlev with Nemolyaeva. I’m amazed at how much you have to love the movie to be in such a frank skit. I don't care about good actors. The 90s are long gone and nothing has changed. Dzhigurda is full...
We also have our own superheroes! Here's Dzhigurda, for example. Wherever you go, charisma.
This charisma managed in 1993 to stir up the action that anticipated the miserable achievement of the Cord ten years later - to record a completely obscene chorus. Let's take it big! The film contains all possible and impossible swear words. It is possible that the dialogues were built as follows: there is a list of curses (one hundred things), there are replicas (two hundred things), a script is obtained by combinatorics. In fact, swearing here for the place and out of place! The cord still jumps on this calf, as, in principle, and Dzhigurda. Sex and mate people are not tired yet - but believe me, and it will happen. Anyway, until all the steam is released, unshaven Brutals can still attract attention.
Speaking of sex. This movie is almost pornographic. As much as can be considered pornography shameless thrash (Jigurda is still not Stallone, albeit taller).
This is now a mortal, purely commercial approach: strong words, high-quality blowjob, any whim – just business and manipulation. But it wasn't always that way. There are few places where you can trace the process of expanding the consciousness of Homo sauvieticus as in the garbage blockbusters of the nineties. The ideals of youth, the irrepressible call of the soul, glasnost imposed in order, in the context of a complete inability to deal with the personal and public, gave rise throughout the country to total brutality and a monstrous switch to “blackography”. Someone will then calm down, someone will be ashamed, looking in the mirror - but the movie captured these days, albeit according to artistic value and evaluation of him - a stake with a minus.
Historical document, chronicle of the bottom. You can't take it off again.
What’s the difference between sex and life, you know? Life is tougher!
The nineties of the twentieth century in Russia were a turning point, it was at that time in Russian cinema that banditry became especially popular and romanticized. Nikita Dzhigurda did not surprise everyone with his wild habits and statements, but the first sprouts of complacency were visible. What else can this film be called but an ode to itself and its own flamboyant principles?
At first glance, this is an ordinary night movie on VHS for our fathers and grandfathers, many of whom still love stories about gang violence with mandatory nudity. But from each scene, “Superman involuntarily” literally blows Dzhigurda himself, which makes the film not just weak, but unbearable. The plot is relatively clear, but it is completely not formed into something digestible: boring and comic sex scenes, where the actor appears if not as a mutant, then as a bull-inseminator, interspersed with scenes where a “talented engineer” (thanks to the annotations for clarification) or urines enemies with the zeal of Bruce Lee (pity, not with the same speed), or starts unnecessary, lengthy conversations with terrible quotes, or to the endless accompaniment of jigurdinsky songs, then suffers, then remembers about his beloved.
It was probably supposed to look cool, pompous, even more serious than the ultimate truth, but can Nikita Dzhigurda be taken seriously? I do not want to insult or humiliate this person. Just his approach to his own picture completely destroys its independence as a film product. “Erotic Superman”, oh, sorry, “Mutant involuntarily”, why, in general, “Disassembly in Nikitinsky” look like an unintentional self-promotion, where Dzhigurda appears before us as a real hero, a fighter for world justice, a defender of beautiful women and a victim of a criminal cycle. No clear script, no really interesting episodes, no standout supporting actors, or anything else... Only He.Amen.
I don’t like it when a film becomes completely faceless because of two things: the inability to provide the material to the audience at its best, and the director’s unwillingness to make a normal, understandable movie, devoid of complacency and hubris. Unnecessarily protruding seriousness and formidableness are nothing more than a reason to laugh through tears. And tears through boredom. What is worth one name, but the content is even worse! The film deserved to be accepted into the guard of the domestic low-grade thrash and occupy one of the leading places there.
1 out of 10
How difficult is it to watch this movie? I paused the tape about ten times, performed “urgent” chores around the house, constantly checked my mail, brewed coffee several times and was already thinking about walking the neighbor’s dog, but still took my will into my fist and examined this creation. Nikita Dzhigurda, being in the frenzy of the dashing nineties, realized that you can absolutely everything, therefore, the picture “Superman involuntarily, or Erotic Mutant” was published.
I will not go into the twists and turns of a plot full of scenes of copulation, poorly staged fights and incredibly strange dialogue. I will only note that this picture is the apotheosis of that terrible time, which took place under the slogan “Freedom of speech!”. This movie is a set of scenes that are diluted with poems by Nikita Dzhigurda. The camera work is dull, and the narrative is inadequate. Watching is scary, in places - panicky. None of my friends dared to see this film to the end.
Of course, the movie came out in the era of fashionable fighters who came to our country from the West. Each actor wanted to be brutal, and the owner of a loud voice and did want to be the brightest example of a carrier of the masculine principle. And if “Love in Russian” I watched with interest, then this creation I watched with an absolutely inadequate reaction, which was replaced by apathy.
As a result: indistinct scenario, statements about the genitals, hoarseness, violence, fantasies of the screenwriter.
And now a little bit of alternative opinion without criticizing the film. Everyone has a dream. The main character has his project and his favorite girl, for the sake of whose happiness he is ready for anything. Love is blind and makes us do crazy things. If you make an adjustment to the fact that the film was shot in the hurricane nineties, you can find some common sense. The main thing, my friends, is self-irony and a sense of humor.
1 out of 10
Still can not understand that in this “masterpiece” forgot the great actor Yuri Yakovlev? absolutely not his movie.
To be honest, what I wanted to show with this picture Nikita Dzhigurda – I do not know either. The whole film looks like a set of frames with poems by Dzhigurda in the background. In principle, the “depth” of the tape can be judged by the name itself, which means absolutely nothing. It sounds loud, but it doesn’t make sense.
Let's start with the first shot. Some type covers the three-storey mat of Dzhigurdu himself, and then gets kicked in the balls, because it is impossible to offend Nikita with a mat. After that, the main character goes to talk about his super-project, gets a turn at the gate, then a couple of dialogues about nothing, a sex scene (here the author tried), then fights, shooting, running, a little more sex and the finale. The whole movie is 60 minutes, which is exactly one hour. That's why he doesn't get bored. Perhaps this is the only plus that is worth noting. The rest is wild nonsense. Nikita Dzhigurda (director, actor, author of poems for this film) was clearly inspired by pathetic American heroes, because of what his image looks like a talentless copier from the West. The same goes for the idea of the painting itself. Everything is strictly according to the template - a brutal man who is brutal and a man, a beautiful woman who must necessarily be in bed and completely crooked opponents. Of course, it is impossible not to note the fact that the tape causes a smile due to its unreal delusions, but this is only for those who are in the topic. The rest will turn off this burda in 2 minutes ... and will be right.
Conclusion: Full Dzhigurda!