Life through the prism of music, or mixing with the dirt of everyone and everything - as the best means of justifying yourself and presenting yourself as a saint.
One of my friends said in the title of his review - "Life through the prism of music" - and he really said the right words. Whatever nasty humiliating nature was said about the work of Zhora Kryzhovnikov, it is impossible to deny the fact that he is almost the only one who would dare to show the everyday problems and values of the relationship between a man and a woman through such a non-standard and at the same time provocative prism. Let it be so bold, rude and somewhere even uncouth, but it is vital for us for those who understood the seed of the idea inherent in this comedy. Moreover, none of our directors have been mixed with dirt so harshly and not lowered to the full program, even Andreasyans got less - but nothing should be surprised, because the haters, along with the BadComedian fanatics, will continue to insert their paltry five pennies of bile and inadequacy. I took a close look at the negative reviews, and I noticed one trend that repeats over and over again when every movie we make comes out — almost everywhere there are units — which suggests, most likely, simply following the crowd, not expressing your own opinion. This phenomenon is not new to me and has long been a sad diagnosis. I still do not understand this total underestimation of the rating and all this negativity, among other things, and I do not understand what our “highly intellectual and highly spiritual elite” do not like.
"Alcohol propaganda." I would like to remind you (if someone has forgotten or sealed) that we do not live in the West, but live in a country where this has long become the norm and for many fans, putting on a bottle is considered the meaning of life. And such people are enough not only in villages, provinces or urban-type settlements, but also in the cities themselves - just look out of the window closer to 23:00-00:00 in the morning and see a certain contingent on the bench from two to five to six on average people led by vodka or strong beer. Of course, there are too many libations in the film (after all, it was necessary to be more modest in this regard), but it is shown with a beautiful satire on the drinking part of our society with one simple morality: drunkenness has not yet brought anyone to good, but only aggravated the already strained relationship in the family. But for some reason they do not notice it, as if they do not even try to do it. After all, it is easier to see nothing than to make at least a small effort and overcome the herd feeling. And to write off your discontent on the fact that “yes, my yard is perfect and never a drunken living soul has not passed” is generally ridiculous.
Propaganda of treason and its forgiveness. Some people who are particularly self-confident say that “the women here have been made stupid” and “that I would not forgive such a thing,” but few of them know that some women deliberately make themselves so. Believing in another fairy tale and then cruelly burned, they themselves create this image of a naive fool, gradually turning into a bitch of low or high flight. So I absolutely don’t understand the indignation that if you, dear girls and women, don’t want to be stupid and bitches, you should first start with yourself and reconsider your views and change your character before the stage turns into hopeless, lifelong feminism.
In general, from everything I analyzed above, it turns out that it is because of the above two factors that the film is hung with various labels from dummy to slag, and is hung especially ruthlessly and cynically. But very often, behind the outer shell, people do not see the very essence that actors and directors tried to convey - and the problem, accordingly, lies in ourselves and in our narrow-mindedness and total limitation. We are used to all sorts of templates in cinema and film genres, but for some reason we do not want to go beyond this template, believing that we do not need it. I watched this film on TV and never felt disgust — because for me, as a kind of psychologist, it’s all life and truth, only presented from another unusual angle.
To sum it up, Comedy of a new genre in order to sing somewhere, somewhere - to laugh or just smile, but somewhere - and to sadden and reflect on our harsh reality.
9 out of 10
Ladies, please answer this question. Imagine, it's a winter evening, it's dark, you get off the bus and go your own way. And then you get chased by some drunk man. Sticks to you, throws snowballs, tries to sing. How will you feel? Would you like it? Would you like to be in such a situation? Will you feel sympathy for this person?
This is where the movie “The Best Day” begins. That drunk man is the main character Petya Vasyutin. He is not presented as a negative character. On the contrary, it seems that we should empathize with him, despite the fact that later in the film he showed himself as a bastard. He boozes, cheats on his fiancée Ole with the first woman he meets and does not even feel guilty. It is not enough to say that he does not consider it necessary to apologize to Ola, he does not even try to somehow delicately explain to her that he fell in love with another. He tries to hurt her in every way, mocks her, humiliates her. She tries to go away, but he pursues her again and pours more salt on the wound - I, they say, marry, but another, we have everything for real, and you will be alone, and do not call me later.
This is the main problem of Russian cinema - directors and screenwriters, working on the script, forget to ask why this or that character should be attractive to the viewer. Here are the images that often cause rejection, or even disgust. As for such a “genius of cinema” as Zhora Gooseberries, he has one scheme – the characters should be boozy drunks, and the audience will laugh. Not only the main character of this film, but the rest of the characters are still moral freaks, cattle and drunks. And don’t look at the fact that some of them are played by respectable and respected actors, the images don’t get better. You'd better wonder how these people could get smeared in this non-comedy.
You know, being in a bad movie is not that scary. But to play such scum - that's what should be ashamed of. Personally, after that, Nagiyev was so disgusted with me that even the children's "Voice" did not want to watch. It would be great if by the next season the host changed, but it can only dream of.
The only character in the film who can inspire compassion is Olya. If she's with an alcoholic, it's her fault. And the fact that she returned to him is not a happy ending, but a path to new sufferings that will begin when Vasyutin swells again and cheats on her from the first meeting.
For those of you who liked this movie, please tell us which character you liked the most and why? Why do you like him? Why were you interested in watching him? Do you identify with him?
A few words about humor in this comedy. He's gone.
We have not yet had time to move away from the nauseating "Bitter! 2", as the next dish is presented to us and this does not interrupt the taste, but only aggravates, for it is also "Bitter!", only even more bitter. The film is definitely bad, absurd, shining with stupidity and vulgarity. Indeed, Zhora Kryzhovnikov once again confirmed his status as a cancerous tumor of Russian cinema.
First of all, The Best Day isn’t a comedy at all, it’s more of a drama. Personally, I mourned the fate of Russian cinema and the humiliation of good actors. If you take this action seriously, it becomes painful and bad.
Secondly, this "film" is not just secondary, given that "Bitter 2" has already started and passed, then "The Best Day" is secondary from the secondary, because it can safely be considered the third part of that terrible wedding and god-awful funeral.
Thirdly, a huge mistake with the selection of actors. They're not just "out of place," they're not in their movie at all. How did Churikova and Boyarsky get there? Why does the director's wife wander through all his films in the most inappropriate ways for her? Why in 2016 should we look at the raped and exploited for the hundredth time wherever we can see the image of ensign Zadov? Image, attention, 2004! All the “Kryzhovnik” actors in their standard roles, which was boring on TNT and finally finished in his films.
Director, don't shoot any more... Not yours.
I start to fear my tastes, but my mother taught me to face my fears.
The best day was the summer Tuesday after work.
It was a normal working night. I didn’t plan on going to the movies, and I didn’t even know the movie existed.
As it turned out, I was familiar with the work of Zhora Kryzhovnikov, but I learned about this afterward. By this I mean that I was virginally pure in judging my impressions of the film. They were not influenced by the venerability of directors or super trailers.
But back to the painting. Tuesday night, I randomly switch movies to iptv in search of something to watch before bed and do not expect anything extraordinary.
To be honest, the only thing that caught my eye was Nagiyev, I recently became a fan of his work, but he continues to please me and delight me. There are such actors who reveal themselves apparently after a certain age or the matter is not in me, we will continue. Nagiyev is certainly a strong center of attraction, but the format in which the film was shot is not close to me, a film shot on the phone with a semi-documentary with a picture. And my finger reached for the channel switch, but I didn't have a chance. No, he wasn't real. Because after Nagiyev appeared Julia Alexandrova singing ' Don't be born beautiful' and a moment later the girl - vamp, the girl - black hole Olga Seryabkina. And I realized I was missing. He disappeared from this reality for 112 minutes.
This is already in the process of viewing, after reducing the level of morphine in the blood, I realized the presence in the picture of Boyarsky, Churikova, Yakovlev, Tsapnik ... Movies with such a density of stars are rare in our time. And the talent of the old school do not drink, so the conversation about the acting in principle can not be. But the stars are not the only part of the pleasure, the dance at the gas station, the brave Julia Alexandrova on the fire truck, Nagiyev + Light Saber + Leps: , the final dance & #39; Thank you, dear & #39; in Bollywood format. I have no delusions, it is just necessary to see, be sure to see.
Surprisingly, the endless series of enthusiastic reviews does not promise multiple catharsis when watching the film. And replenishing the personal video library with another masterpiece does not guarantee at all. A similar cruel joke was played with gullible viewers by Sigarev’s “Country 03”, competing with “The Best Day” for the right to be a New Year’s background for crumbling salads and rolling overclocking festive stops. In the case of “Country...”, the rapid-fire delights of film critics were akin to the notorious plot firecrackers, only the rockets subsequently exploded not on the head of Gosha Kutsenko, but in the brains of unfortunate viewers, stunning frustration due to deceived expectations and splashing as a result, thereby smelling sharply New Year’s Eve, which is what this film creation actually is.
There is another equally surprising observation. Shared approximately equally laudatory and devastating reviews – this is a sure sign of an extraordinary, original film. This can be put without hesitation in the review list at least in order to understand why he did not leave indifferent and unanimous. It worked well with “The Best Day.” Yes, you can look at directorial techniques under the microscope, looking for good moves and weaknesses. You can argue without respite, the actors of the old school decorated the picture or look ridiculous and foreign there. You can think about what is more in the film - humor, parable, satire, buffoonery or something else elusive, primordial, sad. And is the surface of the mirror too bent by the authors, designed to reflect the Russian provincial reality on the screen? But one thing is certain: the movie looks easy and does not leave anyone indifferent to the final credits.
There is no doubt that after the unscathed fervent “Bitter!” the broad masses of the audience wrote Kryzhovnikov a decent advance of their sympathies. Some even rushed to record the young director as a master, but it was too early to do it, which showed a much weaker “Bitter! 2”. Thank you for not coming in an angry crowd to demand advances back like cheated depositors. The director seems to have learned the main lessons, and the next comedy, enhanced by new techniques and familiar star faces, looks no less cheerful than the epochal successful “Bitter!”. Apparently, a universal film recipe was found, where as mandatory ingredients include such rather obvious things as a classic story base in a modern way, appropriately selected actors, elaborate dialogues, simple people as heroes, a funky soundtrack, happy ending or at least an uncrumpled ending. Indeed, it is much simpler, but for some unknown reason, very few filmmakers understand and feel these simple things. And season this understanding with proprietary techniques and submit the finished result in the form of a whole successful picture, and even a few can.
No, to rank Jora among the great masters of the comedy genre and to assign to the cinema-Olympus is very premature. While you still feel the search, creative doubts, sometimes skipping banal “soap-serial” scenes and even not very appropriate borrowing. For example, why was it in “Best Day” as a refrain to insert a theme from “Athony”? There are no obvious plot parallels with this classic, and this is certainly not a pass to the Danelian peaks, rather the opposite. And of course, it is impossible not to notice the author’s trampling in the mastered safe genre of the enclosure, which sooner or later will become close, as you do not improve technical techniques and how do not increase the stardom of the actors involved.
But what is already there is a dashing and not stupid, and on the Battery he even sang along a little, so the overall assessment of the film is confidently positive. Jore Kryzhovnikov can only wish not to hang on to what has been achieved and boldly move forward, and without looking at the notorious Olympus. Let the honored figures have a deserved rest there, no second Danelia and Gaidai are needed, leave the masters alone, they have already exceeded all conceivable and unthinkable plans for masterpieces. Our cinema was and will continue to need new talented faces, original and original. Jora makes such a request confidently, good luck to him on barbecues.
I was inspired to watch this movie by an inner voice. The ratings he received at the box office said that it was not worth watching. But I didn’t believe it, I believed it.
He turned out to be absolutely right in the end. The film surprised me a lot.
It looks like a fresh wind. You turn it on and immediately you are immersed in its atmosphere, it draws itself into its world. But in order to like it, or rather, the condition of this is, in my opinion, love for our country, for its stunning beauty of nature, and for its inhabitants.
The film is rich in all colors of emotion. In it we will find very funny and sharp fresh jokes that make you laugh at the top of your voice. And, what you do not expect, in places it is stunningly deep and permeable. It's very piercing. I really liked the lines of the characters, the text of the film, it is fresh and unbeaten, it is honest and touching. It's something new. Some scenes of the film are full of drama and played in theatrical detail with close-ups, and they catch on. Everything is simple, but too similar to what happens in life. Little quiet dramas. But genius is often in simplicity!
The film was created in the scenery of a poor and simple country. It shows that it is possible to make a good film about simple people, simple things, even in the harsh reality we all live in now. Spiritless, with guns, fighters, detectives, horror films, Malakhov's show and so on. The authors used the same toolkit, but used it not dirty, but with soul and kindness. And they did it. I can’t say what their real thoughts were, but I believe in their sincerity.
The unusually torn pace of the film captures and does not let you get bored.
I must say separately that this film is declared as a musical, and it is, in fact, it is, but at the same time it is more like Indian cinema, where musical scenes are built into the plot of the film and in modern Indian films it is not some dull songs, but cheerful modern, well-arranged and sung songs. Everything is the same here, but all the musical scenes in the film are original and original. I have not noticed any plagiarism.
At the center of the film is a long and complex scene with a song. You can see that the scene is long and complicated. I think we should pay special respect for this moment in the film.
As for the selected songs, they are folk. Not all of them were to my liking, but I must admit that each of them is quite expressive. They are performed not so much professionally and correctly, but in a popular way and with the simplicity of an ordinary Russian person with a great soul.
There's almost no falsehood in the movie. Everything was very honest.
The picture is bright, juicy and beautiful. The colors are full. Simple beauties of Russia are mixed with village and road folklore.
Surprised the cast. The film is played by great actors of the old Soviet school, and new young guys who are very harmonious in their roles. Separately surprised Nagiyev, who is generally the same type everywhere. In this film, he is completely transformed and to his hero, indeed, you begin to feel some disgust in places. His play is perceived with admiration and childish delight. Surprised Olga Serebryakina, who in general played in the film almost herself in the group “Silver”, and not being a professional actress (as far as it can be said about the singer), did it, forced to use this word again, very honestly, in places funny, sometimes touching, in places she forced me to empathize.
I think that the director of the film tried to fame, and most likely, the big team of the film worked for fame.
I'm happy, which I wish you all.
Timur and his team continue to reinvent cinema, inventing new genres. We have already seen the mocumentary-wedding, action completely from the first person (by the way, it was cool), Skype horror and iPhone horror. At the end of the reserves of fantasy, an unprecedented hybrid of karaoke and cinema was created. Zhora Kryzhovnikov, the master of “folk comedies”, promises us “The Best Day”, and we understand why promising does not mean getting married.
"Queen of the Gas Station"
To the greatest regret, the film is more like a cheap New Year's musical with the stars of the "Blue Light" on the channel "Russia" (which may be Gooseberry and fond of earlier) on top of which subtitles for deaf grandmothers, which make up the audience of such a movie. The film could be quite a good picture on the patterns of “Love and doves”, if not for a couple of “but”.
"A fool" is a cheerful man.
from the dictionary of J. Kryzhovnikov.
By the first I mean obliquely-crooked-fall integrated, in the style of “what else should we hang on the Christmas tree?”, clips and parody scenes (so the brainchild of George Lucas has not been mocked for a long time), which distort not the worst backbone of the story of a confused man trying to get out. But then the second “but” comes into play, namely the stupid finale, or rather its production. No, “learn to forgive, no matter what they did to you” Menshov promoted, but Kryzhovnikov everything turned out so confused, crooked, and simply not true, as it was only Batman and Superman with their Martha.
The young actors are doing well and thank you. But they are driven by just that generation of the film “Love and Pigeons”. Boyarsky, Churikova, Yakovleva ... what they forgot here, we will not find out, but with their game they successfully brightened up the numerous irregularities of the Kryzhovnikov production. And so... a good idea was mutilated. Kryzhovnikov had the opportunity and strength to put a good folk film, but whether bad taste, something else prevented him from doing this, and the output turned out vinaigrette, moreover unfunny. And about the fact that the country is already in... so also through the cinema, we are reminded of this ... You know, “to poke or not to poke” is a good question, but let’s leave it to Malakhov.
Don't listen to him! Kinch is clear!!! Petrovsky and I looked at it, and we got it. Like rust! All the potics and chicks to watch! That silver tsack, hot thing! I would have written more but my hands are tired!! Karoche watch the movie rusty, aaatve! A century of will not see!!!
... Sorry, it wasn't me, it was my brother who went to the computer! Watch a good movie!
Oddly enough, I liked the movie. It's pretty strong. There are, of course, many disadvantages: acting is not always good, camera work wants to leave the best, sometimes it is not clear why this frame was made, although when Olya sang I liked the camera work.
The film is good because it shows the ordinary life of ordinary people, without much stress on the brain, without the darkness that escalates the situation, a simple story from life. Such films also take place.
Although I don’t like the fact that movies often show disgusting things as if they were the norm, but it’s a problem in our society, for most people it’s really the norm to drink every day, lose your job, change... it’s the norm. But it should not be so, the viewer for himself must determine what is normal and what is not, and you can not succumb to the influence of the film either.
The main character is disgusted, a rather weak person who is nothing in himself, as his father said, the gas station girl is the best thing he had, only she made him better. So he took her and lost her so easily, succumbed to the influence of a stupid, cocky and selfish singer who didn't care about everything and everyone. It was clear from the beginning that this was a mistake, but he made it, did not understand what was at stake. The main idea of the film for me, which, by the way, is not at all obvious, is that such mistakes should be noticed even before you make them and simply do not make them.
The whole environment is disgusting to me, almost everything. A friend of an alcoholic, who is not at all independent and not responsible, will promise and forget immediately. The mother of the main character, whose motherly love borders on idiocy, a singer who, without hesitation, for the sake of her fun, destroy someone’s life. Olga is the only bright spot in this film. People with right views like her have a hard time living in this world. They are always offended, and they experience such insults very hard. For me, the film should have ended differently, she shouldn’t have forgiven him, she had to leave this messy environment and find happiness, she really deserves better. And it turned out that no matter how you screw up or what you do, you will always be forgiven because they love you. Love is not something you can dispose of.
I don’t even want to imagine how much pathos and selfishness it takes to call myself the new Gaidai and the Hero of Our Time. Of course, the director invented these nicknames himself, and that is what everyone calls him. But Jore to Gaidai, like Georgia to the United States (I do not want to offend Georgia). And it would seem that he is filming about the Russian people, but only how does this upstart, let us call everything in our own words, know how the Russian people live in the provinces? He wasn't there himself, I'm sure. Gooseberry just shows how people drink, that's all. The Russian people have never been like this. Again, just drinking alcohol is not funny. It was funny in Soviet comedies where it was ridiculed; and drinking was NOT the norm. They just drink and sing here. This is not a karaoke comedy. But this movie is not a comedy either. It’s just a movie where everyone drinks and ruins everything.
The story doesn't even make sense. It's as simple as a penny. Heroes are undisclosed, moral, though there is, but stretched like a 100-year-old birthday boy on his birthday. For some reason inserted scenes with a lightsaber. It’s all cool, but cool and qualitative are different concepts. Just like the concept of “star” and “good actor”. Nagiyev and Boyarsky are good actors, but they play idiots, and therefore they look bad. The same can be said of the others. There are no heroes in the film to empathize with. Except for the girl, the hero's bride. But if she forgives him, it's her fault. Again, the hero did not realize the mistake, just the Moscow bride left him, and he returned to the former. If in “Love and Pigeons” with which the director of this poverty draws a parallel, the hero repented, worried about treason, then here the hero is directly proud of himself. And in the Soviet film for some reason did not drink. At least that much.
The songs. They are, and they're cool. But this style of Indian cinema has been used for decades, and does not call it a karaoke film. The songs here are fashionable, cool, but this is not an indicator of quality, I repeat coolly and qualitatively these are different concepts. Jora does everything cool, but bad. And his main problem is that in Gorky it is boring. You can cut a lot of scenes and nothing will change. I've seen Chaplin's movies, half the scenes are just jokes. If they cut the plot will not change, but the number of smiles will decrease. And here will decrease only the amount of vodka drunk by the heroes.
To laugh with the was shown here can only be the cattle who think themselves smarter. A normal person will not laugh at an alcoholic. A maniac can only laugh with the blood that flows from a man. But Jora laughed, I'm sure.
A score of 1 point, which I give not deservedly, but simply because it is impossible to put 0.
It happened on the bus on the way from the city where my university is located - home, to his hometown.
There was nothing wrong with that.
My friend and I sat down in our chairs, got comfortable (buckled up, put the bags under our feet), prepared for a long trip: a friendly conversation, or take a nap, or listen to music on our phones, when suddenly the driver turned on the TV!
From the first shots, we realized that there was some shit happening on the screen.
And the further the plot progressed, the more we became convinced of it.
Unfortunately, talking to it, taking a nap, or even listening to music was unrealistic: the TV was broadcasting quite loudly.
We were forced to watch this “creation” during the two hours of the trip, from the beginning to the end, and most disappointingly, the movie ended exactly when we left the bus at our station.
If it had ended earlier - one could have taken a break from it, it ended later - there would have been a sense of relief that getting off the bus interrupts this anguish: watch this film.
But the film ended not too late, not too early - right under our exit.
As I got off the bus I felt empty, bitter; I did not leave the feeling that I had been raped in the brain; I wanted to cry, but at the same time I felt growing anger inside me: at the driver, on the flight, at the passengers laughing at the film.
Looking at my friend, I asked only one thing: Why does the driver hate his job so much that he decided to make such a cruel mockery of us, his passengers?
I don't remember how I got home. I was broken and lost. This film took my mind out of my mind, and my mind went to the farthest corner of my skull, cringing, crying, begging, "Don't hit me again, citizens!" Please don't hit!
That's how I got acquainted with the film "The Best Day"
What exactly did you like?
Vulgar and gaudy jokes below the waist, ridiculous characters, impossible disgusting rehashing - seemingly! - good songs. Terrible shooting, it is not clear what plot, it is not known what morality the director wanted to convey to the spectators, moments of senseless violence, constant drunkenness, drunkenness and drunkenness! - it was all painful to watch.
To all this is the absolute illogicality of almost all the bundles of the film.
It is difficult to give a good rating to this film.
There is still something to be surprised about. We decided to watch a comedy tonight. Get comfortable, start... Almost immediately I began to ask myself: where to laugh? Hard, sharp, truthful movie. Incredibly truthful alcoholics, monstrously forgiving women. Life in a curved mirror, where what is increases in size and acquires clarity and sharpness to the pain in the eyes. I am surprised by the large number of negative reviews. After all, this is really a strong extraordinary movie with a fresh story. This is a social film parable. It hurt me to watch this movie, it was a very similar story in my life. Faith in the best in a person, his fall, hopes, despair, separation. What I disagree with in the film is the offer to forgive and forgive the guilty drunkards (if I correctly understood the idea of the author). 8 out of 10 Original
For 5 years at Kinoposk, this is my first review. Please do not judge strictly, I will not write for a long time, but I can not express myself either.
Of course, the film is not from the category of simply stunning, but it is impossible to equate simply with negative. The director clearly conveyed to us the realities of the present world - the use of some people by others, distrust, and most importantly - you can not lose the most important thing - love.
It seems that initially, even in the title of the film, there is an absolute heresy. But the bullying and wild spontaneity of Nagiyev (as if not in a movie, but walks in the woods), the naivety of Alexandrova, who is like a cute provincial woman in a wild dress and & #39; with koltuns & #39; rides a bicycle, like the incompetence of Serebryakova, who entered the role ' as it was & #39; as well as the magical Churikova, chic Boyarsky, and striking Yakovlev - in the end was played well, cool, juic. I have the feeling that they live in the village closest to me, 30 kilometers away, so each of their actors has entered into his role.
I am not a fan of the music used in the film, but still Nagiyev managed not to improve, and all the songs in his performance turned out to be no worse than the originals, and the song of Gloria Gaynor, although it was transmitted in an ironic manner, turned out to be as penetrating and understandable as it was 10-15 years ago.
In general, the film is very positive, and pseudo-Indian dances and booty-dance fat plus, and another plus - for the song by Mikhail Sergeyevich & #39; Thank you, dear' which, frankly speaking, knocks me to tears.
10 out of 10
Petya Vasyutin (Dmitry Nagiyev) proposes a hand and heart to his beloved girl Ole (Yulia Alexandrova) and receives consent. This is the best day for him! It remains only to inform the parents: the father (Mikhail Boyarsky) will certainly not mind, but for the mother (Inna Churikova) you will have to pick up convincing words. But then quite by chance Petya meets the irresistible Alina Whispers (Olga Seryabkina)...
“The Best Day” is a drama of choice colored by the shell of karaoke comedy, a drama of the clash of pride and mercy.
A man, having received his best day, delights and rejoices. But a period of time passes - everyone has his own duration, and not Peti's flint for about an hour and a half - and a man can doubt and be sad: so this is all? The best day has passed, and it will not be better?
Will be, will be. This is the new best day. Alina is beautiful, she has a lot of money and toys, she likes to sing and naughty, and she has problems, and she so needs the comfort of an ordinary traffic police officer. So what else would he want? Vodka is a detonator, and how to hold on? And flew to the Internet photos and videos, and like a glass vase on the tile floor, scattered and not started family happiness.
"Sorry," says Petya to the ex-fiancée, sobering and repenting. What will be her answer?
Not everything can be put into words. Not everything can be expressed by playing even very talented actors. And Jora Gooseberry gives the characters the opportunity to express the facets of their feelings with songs. And they sing and dance to the best of their soul, flaunting their imperfect living hearts, which have pride, shame and mercy.
The best day is ruined and ruined. Is there anything left to fix?
In place of the shattered best day comes the comma day.
You can't be pardoned.
Day of choice, day of torment, day of hope.
Everyone decides for themselves. Maybe by putting a comma, that day can still be saved. It's the best day ever. And then it, short and often the only one, only one day, may still become – albeit assembled from fragments, but – a bridge.
To the long road of many and many of the best days.
10 out of 10
The slogan of the film is “The Soul Sings”. Frankly, in some moments it is, but in most cases, the only sound it ejects is a dull howl from boredom. Comedy, more precisely, what in Soviet cinema (and not only) was called the word “Vodeville”, filmed in the style of the New Year’s Fire from the First Channel; and this is not at all funny and not funny, because these same Lights I hate because of their insincerity, tension and self-repetition. Singing here is not always in place, although everyone is trying, and this effort is very reflected in their faces. In the end, they paid tribute to Singh’s Snow White. This is not a good thing.
In contrast to the good “Bitter!”, which many criticized (although I liked it), where there was at least something similar to real life, there was a hint, where the ending is simply sucked out of the finger and from other places. So why not give the ending that the Main Hero deserved, that begged for itself and could also be played comically? Science doesn't know that. An inappropriate finale can destroy even a well-made film with a logically built plot, and this one can destroy it.
So, all the same “Bitter!” looked easy, there were more involved different types of characters and revealed more characters. And then Zhora Kryzhovnikov was bitten by Adam Sandler, and he completely lost the idea of the Russian soul that “sings.” On the screen, we do not see the rural hinterland: we were shown seven houses, three boards and a gas station. Yes, in addition to jumping back and forth Dmitry Nagiyev, who plays a little boy in a state of alcoholic intoxication. It's gross and it's gross.
It is also worth noting that the creators of the picture could not resist the use of mocumentary, interest in which in the West is slowly waning. Moreover, there is a pronounced clipping, which desperately emphasizes the frivolity of the action and that once again turns the very concept of "comedy" into thrash. And again, the main thing was to shake the camera, and not try to somehow find in his creation the climax, to which everything should be reduced.
There is practically nothing to say about acting, except one thing: Julia Alexandrova plays the same thing here and in previous films, and her character irritates to the point of impossibility. Old people play because the masters, Nagiyev already said, the rest of the youth is just present. There’s not much room for character development in this story, you could take one song down and it wouldn’t get any worse. As they say, if you are surrounded by fools, then you are the central one. Half rude, half wooden, like Buratino, and humor somewhere? Save a little apt phrases and barely visible self-irony. Barely, my friends.
Jora Kryzhovnikov is a strange director. The first feature-length film was released only 2.5 years ago, but the name has already become known. A huge number of viewers love his films, but a lot of those who spit at the mention. But the main thing, in my opinion, is that these films, with apparent simplicity, contain surprisingly many different subtle references, threads, leads, with a close look at which you can find amazing things.
That’s what happened with “The Best Day.” When I first watched this film, I didn’t like it too much: everything is jiggy, spinning and spinning, and even these songs. But recently I revised it and was pleasantly surprised.
Of course, there are some shortcomings. Strange, almost insane camera angles (although there are practically none in the second half of the film), sometimes slight disharmony of music and action. But there are many more.
What's the movie about? You can, of course, start telling: “About the DPS employee who met with a popular singer, etc.” But this is nothing more than the top layer. So I'll just say, people. About the most ordinary people and their life situations. Sometimes so strange, so ridiculous... but surprisingly sincere. They pass in front of us, whirling in the whirlwind of popular songs, and inevitably you start singing along with them. Yeah, it's a karaoke comedy. But not in the sense that you need to sing in the movies, but in the fact that life is such a kind of karaoke. People live and sing different songs in the shower, whether it's "I Will Survive," "Green-Eyed Taxi," or "Battery." And that, I tell you, is great. After all, if the soul does not sing, it is so dreary ... (by the way, this is very well depicted in the film).
You can, of course, begin to disassemble other “strings” of the film (like, say, references to the films “Athonya” and “Love and Pigeons”, the accent in “I will survive”, which by the end of the song disappears, the manner of the operator), but it would take a very long time. So I'll just say, watch this movie. Here actors play well, many beautiful songs, beautiful nature. There's a lot of good stuff here.
The third chapter of the epic of Zhora Kryzhovnikov about Russia through the eyes of drunks is not much different from its predecessors. But this “masterpiece” is more insulting triple for a number of reasons.
1. Favorite actors.
Churikova, Boyarsky, Yakovleva – these are the latest victims of modern Russian filmmakers. It is a pity that they were dragged into this “bitter” whirlpool of Zhora, apparently the money is to blame. You can understand that life is not cheap now.
2. Favorite songs.
When I saw in what situations in the film the characters uttered native songs, I took anger. Of course, I understand that the director wanted to say that people sing like that, in this state. But the situations were frankly delusional, overflowing with ragged footage. The degree of insanity galloped throughout the film, sometimes reaching a boiling point, when outright vulgarity poured on the viewer. And so I had to sing along, too.
3. Eh... Dima, Dima...
I love "Caution modern!", Nagiyev just shone there. A lot of water has flowed since then, the shine has faded, Nagiyev relaxed and on the wave of popularity began to star in everything in a row, not really trying to get into the image. In this film, Nagiyev’s wig played better than his carrier.
For these three things it was a shame, the rest just annoyed.
It was annoying that the actors of the three films are in the same images, not a drop of change. Only their clothes change.
I was annoyed by this constantly twitchy camera. Ask for a tripod from the film fund!
It's annoying it's not funny! Well, the voiceover laughter would be let out, so that it was clearer where to laugh.
In the end, instead of concluding, I will give the formula of modern Russian comedy according to director Kryzhovnikov:
(lack of humor + mobile phone + immoral characters) x1000 liters of vodka = 10,000,000 rubles
In any case, the perception of the film depends on the person, on his mental state. Negative is enough in real life, if you tune in to the positive and get what you want.
Someone is looking for hidden meaning everywhere, trying to find some shortcomings, director’s mistakes, bad acting of actors.
But that’s not the main thing, I think the main thing, is the feeling that you feel after watching the movie. Comedy is generally the most difficult genre. A sense of humor is a sign of intelligence.
“The Best Day” is a new comedy. There is no vulgarity, stupid jokes “below the belt”, a comedy that can be watched by the whole family.
I compare it to my favorite film, The Diamond Arm, the same positive emotions, good spirits, and the desire to see it again. And even more, some atmosphere of cheerful optimism remains after watching and does not let go.
Some people don’t like the “alcohol line” in the movie, but that’s life. Remember the comedies of Gaidai, was it not in them, however, why they are the most beloved. The main thing, as shown on the screen, is kind, soulful. That’s the quality of the director.
I don’t know who, but I like the actors.
Julia Alexandrova is a very beautiful woman and actress. Plays great, the dialogue, the feelings that she conveys from the screen, everything is real. Her smile and charm are perceived as in life.
Dmitry Nagiyev is a real comedy actor. It is not clear why directors use his talent so little.
Maters Boyarsky and Churikov about them and nothing to say, always play at a high level.
Watch and have fun. And don't strain your brain, just relax. It's a comedy.
10 out of 10
Once again, no one understood Kryzhovnikova. No one saw the message and what the author wanted to convey to everyone who watches and loves comedies. For my part, this film cannot be attributed to comedies. It's more of a drama. In principle, modern situations in the modern world are played out. The problem with alcohol and the problem situations because of this alcohol, the moms who are shaking for their sons and who keep their sons close. Fathers who don't care about their children. There is also the problem of eternal forgiveness for any shoals on the part of the second half under the influence of masses of people. It all goes through our lives with music. Which at certain times sounds in our heads. Inconstancy and the problem of jumping from extremes to extremes. Man, folks, this is really all there is. It's just that the angle at which this was all served is a little unusual. With dancing, dancing, singing. I like Olga and her little voice processing. I liked the manner of shooting from different cameras, different distances and technically very interesting shot. A kind of Bekmambetov experiment, as I think. In general, everything in this film seemed serious and sad to me. And she forgave him for nothing.
If you look at it as a comedy, and you expect it to, I guess. That is why for many the film will be a stupid passerby.
And even if my review is not approved as usual, I believe that the film is unjustifiably missed.
9 out of 10
Mr. Kryzhovnikov, like thunder in the middle of a clear sky, came upon Russian cinema. And since then, he has stuck his teeth in the neck of the Russian spectator and sucked his blood and money. At the same time, he decided that there was not enough money, he needed more. I decided to shoot ' Bitter 3' but I thought that for the third time no one would fall for a stupid comedy about stupid people. You can make a good film about stupid people, but unfortunately the word “Good” has not been used for a very long time, and for good reason. And let's start in order:
The main character
Not a very smart DPS employee who likes to drink. Drinking is the main engine of the story. Because of her, he met the future 'wife'. Because of her, he met a singer, etc. For the most part, he is an ordinary man, whom we people call ' Bastard'. He cheats on his fiancée, he behaves like a pig, he debauches, mocks people and after that believes that everyone owes him.
Apparently, Zhora watched the film 'Dirty' in which the main character is also a bastard. Yes, he is a pedophile, a sadist, a pervert, a drug addict and just a person who leads an immoral lifestyle. But if in his case, I sympathized with the hero. Because if you remove all the dirt he was in, we're left with a person who has a psychological illness and can't cope with his problems. I felt sorry for him when at the end everything he had was falling apart with every second. What about the hero Kryzhovnikov - he's just typical 'bad' and he is not at all sorry.
Plot
I feel like the whole story was invented during filming. It’s so simple that you can retell the entire movie in 30 seconds. A film about pigs and finished scum. This is not even a black comedy. There is no surrealism like in Sin City. There's no cynicism here.
Actors
The only actor who fully coped with his role was drinking. Yes, alcohol is the only actor who did exactly what was required of him. Moving the story. If in the film ' On a Needle' the main characters took drugs for personal reasons and they helped to reveal the characters better, then in 'The best day' alcohol is used to justify the actions of the main character of the film.
Why did he cheat on the bride?
- He was drunk.
Why didn't he tell me about himself for 2 days?
- He was drunk.
- Why did he realize it?
- Sobered up.
But the main problem is two things.
1) People go for it. They bring them money. Who forgot, the first ' Bitter & #39; brought 12 times more than it was spent on it. The fees are $10 million. You get it, don't you?
2) The Cinema Foundation gives money for this. One question - 'Why?' At least they look at what they give money.
I hope they don’t at least get paid anymore. Because they get money for the movie. My nerve cells will no longer be restored.
The title already explains the whole point of this... hmm... ' reviews'. But since there should be more text here, it is worth explaining my point of view.
First, the quality of the shooting. Half of the movie is on a cell phone, and it's terrible. I can still understand when such a shoot is at least somehow substantiated by the plot, as in zombie diaries for example. But here it is justified only by the fact that everything is filmed on the phone ... because you have to film it on a mobile phone. Why is that?
Second, it's an idiotic story. This is a film about how Nagiyev (yes, I didn’t remember the name, I didn’t care so much) gets drunk and fucks some left-handed woman on the day of their engagement! There is nothing to add here.
Third, characters. All the characters in the movie are scumbags and junkies. Except for Yuli, the fiancée of Nagiyev. She's the only character who's pathetic, she's the only one in this movie who doesn't drink. All the others drink, behave like finished pigs and literally deliberately, for fun, destroy everything in their path.
Four, humor. It’s like a comedy, but where’s the humor? If the director of this miscarriage finds it funny how a bunch of cattle gets drunk to a pigsqueal and arranges local destruction, then he needs to be treated. Better to shoot yourself.
Five, meaning. He's gone. That says it all. In general, this film could become a kind of social advertising about the dangers of alcohol. But he didn’t, because we were just shown a raging cattle.
But no matter how slag this movie is, there is one plus in it. It's an idea. Gooseberry created a new genre, karaoke comedy! And the idea of making a film in which the viewer is invited to sing along with the characters of the film is really good. It came to the wrong mind, to the head of a man who does not know how to make a movie.
I'm done.
"The Best Day" could be one of the few comedies that's nice to watch on a languid evening. She had the prerequisites for that, so she was. Really good and eminent actors (with few exceptions), an interesting camera work with a combination of torn interframe glues and a scene shot in one take, an excellent musical selection - songs that you want to sing. Of course, a very weak script, but in comedies that is not the main thing. In general, take, glue these pieces together with some good idea and the product is ready!
But the creators decided to glue that apparently was at hand, and at hand was Vodka!
The film develops only after the main character laid well behind the collar. I got drunk, got drunk and went to “joke”: break down doors, jump from the roof into the pool, shoot from service weapons at people, yell something unrelated and naturally cling to the first women I meet. How else is that so funny? Ha-ha-ha! I almost lost my stomach.
It would be better if such a profuse libation and beastly behavior were justified by the ending, in which we would be waiting for the revelation of the ruling brain clouded by a drunk. So no! I messed up, changed, offended, thumped something apologetic in the face and... Voila! Forgiven! Happy End!
Moral: Drink vodka guys, go left, act like pigs. Our women are complete fools, they will forgive everything! Aha...
P.S. A meaningless canvas that can hardly be called even a light comedy. Instead of humor, an alcoholic circus where respectable people are crooked. It looks disgusting!
I didn’t want to see this movie because I felt that there was nothing good there, and most importantly, there would be no fun. When I was on the train, I heard the whole carriage talking about the movie, and then I heard a bunch of people talking about the movie, saying, "This is such a funny and funny comedy." I played this movie, but with a biased attitude. Expecting that there would be a failed and disposable Russian comedy, I never imagined that it would be so stupid and discouraging.
Before us is the story of DPS employee Peter Vasyutin. The day he proposed to his girlfriend and wanted to introduce her to his mother, the hero was waiting for a whole odyssey of events. In his office car crashes drunk singer from the group “Silver” Alina Whispers. In order not to receive punishment, the girl tries to seduce the hero and lures him to drink. As it becomes known, this hero is absolutely impossible to drink, because he flies off the rails.
I was struck by such a famous cast, and that they played in such an unintelligent and empty movie. Mikhail Boyarsky, Elena Yakovleva and inimitable Inna Churikova, what did you do in this film? How did you get here? Director Zhora Kryzhovnikov stuffs Russian cinema with such ordinary and “dumb” comedies of low production and stupid humor. It is because of this that our Russian cinema will not step forward and remains in a quagmire. This is a stupid and stupid comedy for the average Russian viewer who does not want to think, but just watch a “funny” drunken story. What's there to laugh at? Over yourself and others? There is nothing funny here, I want to cry.
This comedy is shot in the genre of karaoke comedy. What is this nonsense? I've never seen such stupidity. In the film, make subtitles for the viewer to sing. It just discouraged me. Stupid on stupidity. So much money and effort invested in this movie, and it turned out again something wretched and lame, this word fits this film - sucks.
I was only pleased to see the game of Inna Churikova, here I smiled. She's a terrific actress and was the only thing I wanted to look at with a smile in this stupid movie. Comic moments she plays unrealistically funny. But the roles of Yakovleva and Boyarsky were empty and in the background, nothing special. No matter how Dmitry Nagiyev jumped and jumped in this film, no matter how he laughed the viewer with the drunken antics of his eccentric hero, everything looked stupid. There were a couple of comic scenes with him and Olga Seryabkina, when their characters were drunk, but the whole comedy is based on this. In general, the film is disappointing and murderously stupid.
"The Best Day" is a Russian musical comedy of 2015 exclusively for those who love films such as "Bitter!" In this new comedy with Nagiyev, a bunch of comic, ridiculous moments, drunken delirium, famous, favorite songs, but in general, it turned out porridge and wretched cinema for an average, near audience. I say no to this movie.
If you value yourself and your time, avoid this stupid, stupid and talentless movie. There is nothing good, interesting, and most importantly funny.
Unfortunately, Zhora Kryzhovnikov is already known to many people due to such films as Bitter! and Bitter! 2. They were presented as a kind of answer to the comedies of Hollywood and almost the crown of satirical humor in Russian cinema. The same was reflected in the collections, from which it is clear that the film paid off more than halfway. If we start from the films themselves, and not from the purchased criticism and good collections, then they, to put it mildly, do not even reach the level of mediocre thrash, being called “comedy”. Jora decided not to stop there and once again cut down money on the same orgy, only with a different name.
It all starts quite peacefully, even though the audience is already from the very beginning worn drunk Nagiyev (how comedy can be without alcohol, right?) It's so funny! ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// If all this ended, then a drunken acquaintance could even be attributed to an excuse for a chance meeting. Alas, the film clearly followed in the footsteps of Bitter! There were new wretched characters, including the main seducer of the film - Alina. From that moment on there is some amateur shooting, because it can not be called a film. Again, jokes with the operator, again alcohol around, cattle-humor, absolutely inappropriate insertions of songs (this is also “karaoke comedy”), and in general everything that happens turns into a complete absurdity, which does not even smell of good humor.
In American comedies, the characters often accidentally get into situations where their activities begin to threaten the safety of others, which ultimately leads to some humorous moment, or simply a tangle of troubles from which the characters will need to get out. "The Best Day" also shows something similar, however, the characters do it because of the constant alcohol intoxication (because in it they are a good part of the film) and simply lack of other entertainment. They're drunk driving a jeep on the beach with people, carrying traffic police officers on the hood, showing their cattle nature, and they do it all for nothing. They have no purpose, they are not random situations, it does not lead to some humorous moment, it is not a twist of events. Zhora Kryzhovnikov believes that the set of these meaningless frames is just humor. This was evident from his previous work.
The characters themselves are also at the level, or more precisely, at the bottom level. Forget the game of Nagiyev in “Caution, modern!”, where he masterfully reincarnated in almost any image, because in this film there is only one image, and he is called “drunken cattle”. Oddly enough, and so you can describe 90% of the picture, because other than that there is almost nothing.
Result: Another low-grade alcohol-comedy from Jora, which shows us the costs of society, the lack of imagination of the screenwriters, poor shooting and, of course, inappropriate mat, amateur editing, corresponding to the bottom humor, which is sure someone will again call satirical. About morality, meaning and logic can not even stutter. Moreover, if in “Bitter!” at least there was not the worst idea, then there is even this. The saddest thing is that while such films pay off, they will continue to come out, more and more embarrassing Russian cinema.
1 out of 10
For several years, moviegoers have developed a habit of showing another Russian comedy in cinemas for the New Year holidays, which claims to be the best and the New Year. There was a lot of advertising on TV about the country's first karaoke comedy. It's good that I didn't fall for it and watched the movie at home much later.
The film was far from the best, but the most mediocre.
Constant scrolling in the film of popular songs (Leps, Boyarsky, VIA Gra, other singers) and dances for them reminded me of the Indian theme, in which almost every shot all the actors dance and sing. But India has a different philosophy of life. And in this movie it turned out erotic and vulgar bias: chest and back seats to show.
The image of a DPS employee Peti Vasyutin turned out to be far unpleasant. A person undecided in life, prone to alcoholism and adultery, a kind of soft-boiled arthropod, calf. Still, Dmitry Nagiyev is an actor with a brutal and charismatic appearance, he is well suited to real male roles, such as a physical assistant, restaurant director.
I liked the role of an alcoholic and a friend of Peti Vasyutin - Valentin performed by Sergey Lavygin (chef Senya from the TV series "Kitchen"). Played it very naturally (if I may say so), it turned out, really comedic.
The loose behavior of the heroine of pop star Alina Whispers, except as disgust for her, does not cause anything more, why is it necessary to popularize such boorish behavior of pop culture figures. On the contrary, they should be a standard of behavior. During the viewing of the picture, the impression was that there, on Olympus, absolutely everyone is like this, but it is not so, there are decent intelligent people.
For such a rapid popularization of not the best qualities of a person I shoot 4 points, it turns out:
The title of the comedy reminds me of the best movie trilogy I saw a couple of years ago. After that, I realized that domestic comedies of this format are not mine at all. However, there is hope in my heart that Russian films can be interesting and bright - this prompted me to watch The Best. Hopes didn't come true. All the humor in the film is built on alcohol and the ridiculous sight of people who got drunk splashing. The plot is unpretentious, some actors seemed ridiculous in their roles (Boyarsky, for example). As a plus, I want to note that after watching there was a strong desire not to use ever again strong alcoholic beverages. Maybe the film is unobtrusive propaganda of the harms of alcohol? Viewing is remembered as wasted time. Is it worth spending two hours of your life to laugh a couple of times at drunken provincials, it is up to you? For two funny jokes and "folk" songs, I pull a score of three points.
3 out of 10
The overall impression is very average, you can even say ' below average' film, sometimes funny, and sometimes ' Lord, why do they do, but I am ashamed?'
Now, in order:
1) Boyarsky - why did you sing 'mom Lubu'? In his performance, the line ' our crib made a shake' sounds as poor as possible
2 Seryabkina - squeezed out of her all sexuality, I would call that part of the film where she is in the frame, the story of her splendor, because she was presented there as a goddess and that all men adore her, which also looked somehow ridiculous.
I don’t argue, it looks very, very, very, but why exalt it in a cult?
(3) The voices of the actors in the songs are not motherfuckers and this is good, because I am not sure about the vocal abilities of Nagiyev.
(4) Stabilization of the picture - pf, who is watching this?
I, of course, understand, there are moments that are filmed like on the iPhone and there I can accept the fact of a shaking camera, but at some points the shoot without normal stabilization and the floating camera were really annoying, although it was clear by the quality of the picture itself that they are shooting clearly not on the mobile.
(5) It is worth noting the quality of shooting long (about 3-4 minutes) one-frame scenes, they were shot quite well (the camera, of course, also shakes sometimes in such a shoot, but in general very qualitatively), such I have not seen before.
(6) Good, such good humor in the film very little.
There are funny moments, but they are mostly associated not with jokes, but with the behavior of the characters.
(7) Songs, songs themselves
In some cases, they are unjustified.
This is not 'Sweeney Todd', not 'Moulin Rouge', not 'Les Miserables', here it is impossible to believe that the characters can just take and sing, and even start dancing, and even with the whole team, and even synchronously, and even at the same time in the camera to watch.
When characters start singing drunk (and they do it more often than on a sober head) - it's one thing, but when it's just like that, it doesn't look like it anymore.
(8) Nagiyev - played well, although what was there to play - a policeman who boozes, indulges his mother and crooks.
(9) By and large, everyone in this film is crooked, not playing.
BUT
The film is better ' Bitter' and ' Bitter 2'
There is no such crap as in previous Kryzhovnikov films, but this does not add quality to the film as a whole.
Out of 10 points I would put this film
2.5 out of 10
A little fervent, kind of dynamic, but bastard, again about vodka and about drunkenness.
Verdict - if such ' comedies' continue to shoot, then our cinema will never be able to get out of the abyss into which it rolls.
Let's figure out how this happened, what happened in general and who all these people are.
The review risks being as incomprehensible as what I just watched. It all began with the advertising of this film, which now and then flashed on the Internet, fascinated with its fun and carefreeness. It worked. I decided to look. I'm here.
The film doesn’t start so sad (except for the first scene in which the main character tries to follow his love, but is taken into his blue nets by a hopsy snake). The main character is the captain, traffic police inspector, groom. Even if it's not in its prime. The heroine is a young provincial beauty, naive and stupid, but very feminine. He proposes to her. What could go wrong here? In Russia, anything. That's right! In a remote province comes the star of show business, a young singer to solve the housing issues of parents. Fate confronts her with the main character, and he - from the cliff. From the cliff to the bottom. I think the story is enough.
So what happened?
We are presented with an attempt to make a comedy suitable for the people, filled with songs, dances and dances, so to speak, so that the viewer’s soul and sing and dance. We don’t have very good quality, especially in terms of music and sound. Heroes sing as they sing in the average bar-karaoke in any small town of our homeland. I'm sure you know what I mean. But there are also positives. They dance better than they sing! Especially young slim girls. That's a plus. And the downside is that this is almost the only plus. Also, the pluses include the play of many actors and their presence in general, I will note the play of Yulia Alexandrova and Dmitry Nagiyev, but with reservations. Both of them were bad in vocals (perhaps that was intended), and sometimes they were happy in emotions. Julia looked very sincere in the last scene.
From mediocrely performed songs and dances, it is impossible to collect a quality memorable comedy, since many other ingredients such as plot, dialogue, thoughts, entourage and characters are lacking. Still, there were a few jokes in the film that smiled because I hadn't heard them before. We've seen the rest. The atmosphere of the alcoholic future of the Russian countryside was very depressing. I don’t want this to happen in my country!
If you love our movie, then, most likely, this picture you will like. Personally, I love movies, and it doesn’t matter who, where and for what money they made it. I am rooting for the cinema and I really want our cinema to please me, not to upset me! Enjoy your visit!
Who are you laughing at? Are you laughing at yourself?
And so, the third film of the brilliant director, the nugget, the second Gaidai, and just our everything - Zhora Kryzhovnikov, in the genre of comedy. And the wedding movie again. This impression is created - whatever the film about Zhora did not shoot, at the end there will still be a wedding, well, or a funeral ... there is almost no difference. And then, the inquiring viewer, there is a reasonable question - and why?Yes, because all the films that, in fact, not about the wedding or funeral, but about BUKHALOVO!! How ridiculous it is to see people degenerate and drink. I always laugh when I see a person sink to the bottom. I don’t even need to watch a movie for that! I live in Russia, and I can watch such a comedy every day outside the window.
And this is how the director simply, funny and cleverly plays all life situations. After that, you look out the window and just make your way to colic with laughter when I see my neighbor, drunk and without thinking, crawling in a dirty puddle, and next to him stand his hilariously beaten and bruised wife and children. Just like everything in the movie! And most importantly, it's just as funny.
Acting, by the way, is right on the level of what I see outside! I mean, it's just like life. He took the phone and went to make a movie. A new trend in Russian films - play as you can. Nagiyev again reincarnated as ensign Zadov from ' Carefully modern' only there was satire on people of this type, and here as propaganda of normal behavior and lifestyle. He is a character who wants to kill and hate from the first minute of the film. All the other ' actors ' crawled over from the previous two films and continue ' play ' the same roles. And why do they change something, the movie is about the same thing!
Special thanks to the Director, with a capital letter, for the fact that every time I hear music from the film, I will definitely feel the pleasant urge of the stomach to clear the contents. And by the way, yes, a huge plus of the film is that it can be misused, like the previous two. A kind of savings on emetic and laxative drugs.
The result: the film for amateurs: beer, semen, sit on the courts (shorts) under the seeds and beer, sneer under the veils from YouTube, does not miss any Russian comedy, fans of Zhora, the cast of the two previous films and of course for those who do not, such petty differences between booze, Russian soul and patriotism.
I’m not going to evaluate it, because I don’t want to spoil my karma by going into a huge minus.
Apparently, the director Zhora Kryzhnikov really believes that he created a unique genre, “karaoke comedy”, otherwise, how to explain the fact that he positions it in this way everywhere. I think we should applaud the creator and inventor! That's just, as for me it's complete nonsense, to make actors sing under the phonogram favorite hits, make subtitles and position it as a new genre, well, or under the genre, it's not so important. Well, I don't know, then you can put, say, folk music into a piece of music in the underground direction and position it as something new. First, the underground plays, then the Russian folk, then the underground again, etc. The comparison may be a bit harsh, but it’s essentially correct. It's an innovation! That’s how it was, of course, not yet, but to position it as a new genre, too early. And given the plot and events taking place in the film, it seemed to me that the time that was allotted to the songs, for the most part, was needed to stretch the timekeeping and for the viewer to remove his hand from his face and remember musical hits, thereby distracting from the stupid plot of the film.
From the very beginning, the film seemed very strange to me, the way the main characters met. It doesn't happen, the girl had to run away from him, if only he was. But it's not total. Totally, the fact that the director from the very first frame already sticks “alcohol” in the face, showing the drunken protagonist. Why? Why can not do without it, why can not come up with something else, and not show drunkards in the frame (throughout the timekeeping)! This is not a Russian soul for a second, this is a shame. Shame on the director that he is limited to these stereotypes.
According to the plot, the hero Naghiyeva and the heroine Alexandrova want to play a wedding, but at some point everything goes awry when the main character meets Alina performed by Olga Seryabkina. And here, perhaps, her appearance, and her in general, I will note as a positive point of this film. All the same, the soloist of the band "Serebro" takes part in this film, not every day you see this. In general, our main character for the wedding scores and goes to drink, party and brawl. When you look at it, you ask yourself one question. Is the director appropriate? Of course, as a result of his feast, he parted with the bride, even, literally from the first meeting betrayed the guilt of everything, of course, alcohol. For the record, alcohol does not make a person incapable of understanding the meaning of their actions and showing the opposite in the film is stupid. The ending is very far-fetched and not believable. Short for characters. The main character is no, just an alcoholic and a scumbag, but still the charisma of Nagiyev still saves him a little. Pop - the singer liked, a good image, but no more, the same applies to the bride of the main character.
Result - another "alcoholic" comedy that is about nothing. And no matter how the creators tried to submit it, allegedly under a completely new genre of comedies, in my opinion, it is not. Poor characters, lack of plot and mandatory attribute - alcohol, all this is a new comedy "The Best Day", and not only. It's very scary for our comedies!
I didn’t want to see this movie and I didn’t want to see anything funny. But the information that someone went to him as much as 2 times, forced still to look. And suddenly they really learned to shoot, suddenly Nagiyev really began to play, suddenly they really learned to write funny jokes for comedies. Unfortunately, cinema turned out to be the essence of everything bad that is in our modern cinema.
Just as we can’t write interesting scripts, we can’t. The story is as straightforward as it can possibly be. In fact, he doesn't exist. The bet was made on a favorite topic - drinking. After all, it seems that our audience loves films about this case, as well as the case itself. But if in the same “Features of the national hunt” it is presented at the level and quite talented, then they considered that the theme will work on its own. There is no such thing as that.
Selection of actors is not clear in principle and leads to even more absurdity. Why Nagiyev? Because he's in fashion now? That's probably why. But somehow I forgot about his age. Here you either had to choose an older partner, or take the main character younger. In this way, it all looks ridiculous and not real. This is the main inconsistency because of which all actors are not in their place.
There's no acting. Nagiyev in his usual image of ensign Zadov, both sober and drunk. For Churikova, Boyarsky, Yakovleva - it was apparently just a money part-time job, before their best roles here like before the moon. Well, Boyarsky generally looks funny when hanging out with the main characters. I wonder how he agreed to this at all. The main female roles at least somehow succeeded, but they are completely lost in the overall low level of the game. Surprisingly, Seryabkin played best. Maybe because she didn’t have to play?
Want to make the originality of the “amateur” shooting? It didn't work. The movie doesn’t win at all, it looks like it’s cheap. This is the case in principle.
Maybe even specially saved on camera work and translated it all into a kind of “chip”. It would be interesting to know the budget of the film. In theory, the film pulls to the level of a series in some series, such as Fizruk or Kitchen. But no, the kitchen looks better.
When it comes to music, do you think about Indian cinema? But at least it's done beautifully, and here? Look at the drunken brawl to hits, which are often performed in a simply terrible manner. Is that karaoke? You can’t even sing along to it, assuming someone wants to do it. This is another nail in the lid, which should forever close this film.
Humor? He's not here. I just don’t know what to call humor. Watching things that are not funny is just disgusting. To be honest, I don’t even know where this humor is supposed to be.
Usually for bad comedies, the phrase “one time rolls”, but this is not the case. This movie is hard to watch until the end. In my opinion, instead of gradually pulling up to Hollywood, our cinema is sinking lower and lower. Against the background of such comedies, even comedies of the 90s, when there was a complete decline, look not so bad.
1 out of 10
