Ask a question. In order to portray the life of society in a plausible way, one must understand how it works or works, what underlies its existence.
If your answer is yes, then you understand the degree of non-obviousness in the logic of society. It is not simple, in order to correctly describe it - you will have to seriously work in terms of education.
To put it simply, the uneducated person’s ideas of what he sees will be, in essence, simply a set of moments, glued together not by a real connection in the world, but by the views of a person. Wherever I want, I sculpt. Whether it was there or not, I sculpt it because I want to. And I'm showing you how it should be. Moreover, I sculpt even what there can not be, because there is no reason, but still sculpt.
And for someone who's touched the subject at least a little bit, it's a pain to watch. The views of uneducated authors are simply absurd.
They try to talk to me about what monarchy is, show the monarch, his society - and from what they say and how they say, I clearly see that this is not a monarchy, but an uneducated idea of monarchy. As with the savage tribes, so with the republics. Delusional and delusional.
And of course, since this is a modern corporate culture, we are given lgbt and other so-called joys.
The output is a real idiom. Absolutely idealistic illiterate representations are abundantly smeared with new pseudo-values.
Plus, only if it's a picture. Because the places for filming were really good.
I don't recommend watching. This is brain gum, defective in almost every way. The same Game of Thrones – based on the medieval history of Europe – is a head above this kindergarten.
In a society where no one knows how to read and write the old, like humanity, how do the worshippers of the flame God know such words as subordination, revolution and so on. Huh?