The idea (revenge) is as old as the world, but probably will always be relevant and popular among filmmakers. Nonlinearity and scarcity are a plus or a minus!? It would seem that the obvious answer is that for the movie it is a plus. Only there is one small (although in fact not at all small, but very significant) catch - ragged. Careless.
more
The idea (revenge) is as old as the world, but probably will always be relevant and popular among filmmakers. Nonlinearity and scarcity are a plus or a minus!? It would seem that the obvious answer is that for the movie it is a plus. Only there is one small (although in fact not at all small, but very significant) catch - ragged. Careless. All the fun is lost. The author decided to pay attention to the preparation of toast, but what is really important is left behind. But what a savor of asparagus... From the point of view of intellectual inventions, their variations and connection with trifling requirements - worthy of praise, but all this is more like separate pieces, there are not enough connecting links, some trifle, so that the film is perceived not separately, but as a whole. And he is clearly not in a position to do so. Where it should be. There is no emotion, no involvement. Thus, the text, the plot - everything is fine with this, the actors kind of try, visually not bad, but the atmosphere and composition as a whole pumped up. What are 7, and even more 8 points in general? Judging by estimates, this is practically a model, an ideal.
|