A logical outcome. The apotheosis of the ineptitude of all this grief-history.
The authors decided to go further and play even more actively not in their field, having made insignificant attempts to portray tension, intrigue, and even action. By the way, it is so inappropriate and bad that it is hard to imagine whether it could have been made worse.
And, although the local drive looks downright hellish, after watching it, it gets bad from the realization that this is not the worst part of the film. It seems that everything turned out unsuccessfully, except, as usual, a pleasant soundtrack. The editing is completely illiterate - some scenes start out of nowhere and end in nothing. Timekeeping is chaotic and causes a strong feeling that the movie can be watched in fragments in a completely arbitrary order, without losing anything (it is better, of course, not to watch at all).
The actions of the characters, according to the classics, are a permanent burning of life in the best traditions of celebrity and boringly filmed, monotonous sex. Fortunately, the writers endowed them with an endless supply of resources and free time.
Outside the cot, expensive resorts and clubs, the film's characters are diligently trying to portray l'amour. This is even worse than in the previous parts. Anastasia is infinitely insolent, Christian is finally soft, and their vile behavior has reached a completely different level. Of course, all the past inefficiencies, secrets, scandals and hypocrisy are back in place. However, the pinnacle of disgust is the case when, due to Anastasia’s fundamental rashness, an event occurs that Christian is not very happy with at first, to which she subsequently reacts by throwing out a rather entertaining stream of her own consciousness, and of which, almost directly, accuses him himself. Compounding the situation, it was a response to a similar attack on the same occasion from Gray. In general, this is already a form of madness and brutality, which is simply unpleasant to watch. Although, it should be understood, in the view of Erica Leonard, this is how the family is supported and conflicts between husband and wife are resolved. If in the first part their behavior looked terribly ridiculous, but very fun, then in this nothing but squeamishness and rejection to them can not be experienced. Everything that before caused a smile and was funny, in the end sunk into oblivion, and in the place of the former, a noble serpentary turned around.
Christian and Anastasia behave nasty, brazenly lie straight in the eyes and with all their actions clearly show that the most unpleasant guys here are not those whose negative characters have been so diligently trying to introduce into the script since the last part, but they themselves.
' Fifty Shades of Freedom' lost all those few tolerable aspects of the first part: playing on stereotypes and the funny moments associated with it. All that remained was unthinkable talentlessness, despondency and destructive morality.
A film made by talentless people who do not understand anything about a good movie and spit on cinema as a phenomenon.
2 out of 10
The world was divided into those who took '50 shades' and who did not accept them, who considered the grains, and who bothered with the chaff. All these sanctimonious and highly wise rhetoric about the low moral component, about frank porn and rabid sadomazo are not only ridiculous and, at times, cause doubts about the mental health of the defendants. Have you not lost the goodness of God’s grace? This is not ' War and Peace' not Fyodor Mikhalych and not even Margaret Mitchell! Having begun to pick out the flies that have fallen asleep, embarking on lengthy arguments about the incompetence and vulgarity of the script, the far-fetched plot, stupid insinuations and no actors, did you direct your righteous anger there? What is the point of sprinkling ashes on our heads when we are just a tracing from a certain way of life accepted in certain circles, the message that love remains love, regardless of any circumstances - be it Paris bottom or Buckingham Palace? Or is it more important to leave your sanctimonious opinion?
About pleasant and not quite: the trilogy ended and became, somehow, sad. Anastasia, who, thanks largely to the voice of Maria Ivashchenko and, not least, her Russian name, became, simply, the subject of adoration and no matter what Dakota Johnson created, just the image that was demanded of her – the characters live on their own and, in today’s world, this is not news. In the third part, unlike the previous ones, the editors' scissors did not walk so cruelly through the original, leaving, to the indescribable delight of the concerned, scenes with her naked body - the world took another step to the edge of the abyss? It is, of course, to whom - what, but, on the other hand, if you have given a work a certain direction, please follow in the fairway and, periodically, throw a bone to the viewer, if he is from a carnivorous tribe. However, it is likely that the predation was targeted because of increased views or as a reward. Imho, it was obviously unnecessary.
So, we saw the creation of another film masterpiece - no matter how it was presented to NME, what the critics predicted in "Rotten Tomatoes" & #39; and what regalia was awarded in Frisco - the film became the best-selling, earning half a billion dollars, exceeding the box office more than 10 times what was spent on it! Is this not a reason to think about those who consider themselves a dock in chewing spiritual food and ask the question: ' Perhaps I do not understand something?!'
What an irony. Empty and delusional first two films bypassed Golden Raspberry. And when the screenwriters suddenly remembered that they had a trilogy, not a buffoon, and instead of cheap eroticism wrote the plot, the movie immediately got the award. To be honest, it was a little hurtful. Because the third film is a head above the horror that we have seen before.
So Christian and Anna got married. But family happiness is hampered by several factors. The first is the old enemy of the heroes, ready to kill them by all means. Oh, so diligent that the other movie maniacs cry on the sidelines. The second is Anna's pregnancy, which disgusts and frightens Christian, because he is not ready to become a father (because he is still 'boy'). Problems fell on the heroes like snow on their heads, but the end is so close.
This is the best film of the trilogy. Cheap eroticism has become less (five scenes, and one behind the scenes), the characters finally behave as if alive - Anna rehears and mocks Christian, who plays himself a nervous husband. Better than cardboard images from early opuses! In the end, the action is so gaining momentum that you watch the last half an hour without stopping (and the film about timekeeping is shorter than the previous ones). This is nonsense, especially for this saga!
But, unfortunately, the movie did not get rid of the sins of ancestors. Dialogues are just as empty, a lot of unnecessary scenes from which you rush to sleep, and the script is so overturned that sometimes you think it would be better not to have it. Especially the villain. Who is he? Why is he motivated? He is caught and released, and he returns and takes revenge again. And his goals are not the degradation of the writers, not something else - to kill everyone and cook.
Although for a villain level 'cheap soap' - it probably will. You can't expect more.
But what really hurts is the leaked questions that the second part raised. Where did the former go, what happened to her; where did Elena go, because she promised to spoil the lives of the heroes? And Christian's past, which has been hinted at for so long, has been left aside. So why did you need two movies? They did not develop heroes, he has no logical ending, he is empty and constantly & #39; flaunts & #39; allegedly stylish erotic scenes and the way of life of rich people. After all, if you want, you can really remove a lot of scenes and glue one big movie! Really. But no. James got rich at the expense of the youngsters who fell for ' erotic' (maybe in the book it really is – I will not check), the creators of the film ' hype' and shook the money. Everyone's happy, happy. The movie, like a long conveyor, worked!
'Fifty Shades of Freedom' - the finale of the worst trilogy in the world. Compared to her 'Bladraine' Ball is almost a role model. But on the other hand, there is not a dull (but dull) plot, less wild talk and unnecessary eroticism - this has already made the triquel a better part. Thank you for that too.
In 2011 (in 2012 in Russian), the book by the British writer E. L. James (née Erica Mitchell) 'Fifty Shades of Grey' was published for the first time. The novel caused a mixed reaction: Puritan-minded readers were indignant at the natural description of erotic scenes involving BDSM elements; others on the contrary enthusiastically took the book, considering it one of the most sexually free. In general, on the wave of public resonance, E. L. James achieved her own: the novel became a bestseller, bringing the writer a huge profit, and the film company ' Universal Studios' hastened to conclude a contract with E. L. James for the film adaptation. By the way, by that time there were already three books, and the film project accordingly stretched into a trilogy.
In 2015, fans 'Fifty Shades of Grey' finally could fully enjoy the long-awaited artistic version of the acclaimed novel. The film company happily rubbed their hands, because the film adaptation foreshadowed a tangible box office (which, in general, happened: the film collected more than 570 million at the world box office, and only 40 were spent on the creation), but not everything was so beautiful. The fact is that in addition to good profits, 'Fifty shades of gray' received a whole heap of plastic 'Golden raspberries' including in the main nominations and this achievement, frankly, very, very doubtful. As a consequence, the director of the first part Sam Taylor-Johnson left the project and James Foley, known for the films ' Fear', ' Scam' and ' Perfect Stranger' was called upon to restore his reputation in two subsequent films. Admittedly, Foley failed this trick.
So, this is the background to the appearance of the final part of the trilogy about the romantic relationship of a young millionaire Christine Gray with sophisticated sexual addictions (embodied the image of Jamie Dornan) and a modest employee of the literary agency Anastasia Steele (played Dakota Johnson). In the triquel there were some changes, in particular they affected the genre of the picture. If in the previous two parts we watched a love drama with a clearly expressed erotic context, then ' Fifty Shades of Freedom' turned into a melodramatic thriller. The heroes of the story played a chic wedding and bathe in the rays of happiness, Gray carefully protects Anastasia, but suddenly a villain appears on the horizon, ready to sacrifice everything to harm the charming couple. And one day, Gray, who put guards on his wife, still loses sight of her. Ahead of another fight for the beloved, where completely unexpected secrets of the past will be revealed.
Surprisingly, the third part deserved the most positive feedback. It is likely that this was influenced by a change in the genre characteristics of the film. Finally, instead of boring terms 'dominant' and 'submissive' (people far from BDSM thanks to E.L. James learned what it means) there was a dynamic action, instead of the played sentiments, some tension curled and in general some were happy that the torment of the film adaptation project 'Fifty shades. . . ' over. But still do not think that because of the positive reviews, the film turned out to be good. No, it doesn't mean anything, it's still flimsy, with poorly crafted characters, banal dialogue and a few scenes where Dakota Johnson appears nude. In addition, if you take the detective component 'Fifty Shades of Freedom', it is very easy to predict who is behind the adjustable troubles of the Grays and who the villain goes in assistants. To look, honestly, is sad.
Throughout the film, I never let go of the idea that I was in front of a television movie, not a feature film. Even there was complete confidence that together the whole picture it would be better to release, say, a six-part mini-series, for sure it would have received more approval, however, it would hardly have been shown in prime time. And in the opinion that it would be better to convince the actors. Dakota Johnson is the daughter of famous actors Don Johnson and Melanie Griffith, so the way to the cinema was well-trodden. Dakota dutifully nude in the film (in the first part, there is a feeling that she spent most of the screen time without clothes, once her mother was not chastity in her youth), but her game showed that it is still very, very early to talk about the star of the actress and her lot - it is to prove the viability of the series. The latter concerns Jamie Dornan, who was not convinced that his character is a very rich man and a deep love for the character Johnson was extremely difficult to admit. And the secondary actors left such fleeting memories that there is nothing to talk about.
I do not think that it is necessary to deny the fact that the books of E. L. James and their subsequent film adaptations were infamous in such a way that only the well-forgotten to date can compare with them ' Emmanuel' Only here is the influence on the genre of erotic cinema from ' Fifty Shades...' quite controversial: someone learned about sexual perversion, and someone categorically called them morally and aesthetically low. In any case, the trilogy did not stand the test of audience criticism, but brought a good jackpot to the producing film company. And we can conclude only one thing: it is good that the project was completed, even on a minor note.
5 out of 10
It so happened that the literary trilogy '50 shades, etc.' I met because of my work. I am a schoolteacher, and the children just buzzed all the ears that, they say, there was a new literary & #39; masterpiece & #39; which I have to read, etc. In general, I downloaded the trilogy on my e-book (it’s good that I didn’t buy it in paper) and overpowered it all in three days. Actually, there is not much to read, most of the erotic scenes I just missed, because they are very mediocre and boring, dialogue is no better. And here comes the adaptation of this creation. As you can see, I did not spend money on the ticket and watched two movies at home, stirring the soup and my dishes. Movies are as boring and dull as books. But the final part came out and I want to say 'Yay!!!! Finally!!! It's over!!'
To begin with, the story is simple and straightforward. Even the movie didn’t make it any more interesting. Perhaps because the writer herself and her husband had a hand in making films. Everything is simple, predictable, the actors play without a light, there was absolutely no chemistry between the main characters and there is no, although Anastasia and Christian continue to frantically have sex wherever the opportunity comes. The actors themselves, in my opinion, are non-charismatic, non-sexual, conflicts in the film are simply sucked out of the finger. Of course, the orphanage guy is smarter and more capable than any security guard, can pursue the wife of a millionaire without any resources and skills, while remaining in the shadows. In reality, Mr. Gray’s security did not consist of two or three men, but of two or three dozen bodyguards of the highest rank, since he is being pursued. I'm wondering how Mr. Grey makes money, because he's always texting his wife, coming to her for nonsense, etc. He is not capable of keeping anything under control. Since he's such a domainant, he could have monitored his wife's doctor visits. And a grown man does not know that sex does not end with pregnancy. Plus, the unpleasant moment in the film is a screaming luxury, which just begins to vomit. Why would we stick Anastasia's ring in every frame? We already realized that an unremarkable girl was fabulously lucky to marry a rich guy.
The highlight of the film is the bed scenes, but they last so little and boring that there are no highlights at all. It feels like Mr. Gray can stay in bed for no more than three to five minutes. Prelude with ice cream just causes laughter, especially looking at the grimaces of actors who are clearly tired of this nonsense.
But on the film still worked, I like the change of angles, although the operator tried to fame, a couple of points for a beautiful view and that we can put
I am quite calm about inconsistencies, blunders and some awkward things on the screen. But 50 shades is one of those movies that I want to comment on.
If you throw away all sorts of bdsm and sadomazo things, the first two parts quite look like a fairy tale about Cinderella. But what about the last part, it looks very tortured and stupid.
If in the first part Anastasia quite corresponds to his image of a student-gray mouse, in the second part she turns into a pretty well-groomed woman, then in the third part she begins to irritate.
She becomes too self-confident in everything, she looks ridiculous, baring her breasts on the beach, the scene of pursuit on the car looks ridiculous, she looks ridiculous in the role of the boss and with a weapon in her hands.
The once gray mouse tries to show and defend its independence, but at the same time creates an absolute feeling that everything that the heroine has achieved solely thanks to Mr. Gray, including the position of editor-in-chief. I can't believe she's so talented that she's promoted.
And if in the first part it causes sympathy, then in the last it begins to frankly irritate.
There are no complaints to the actors, I externally like both, but I just wanted to squander the scenes of intimacy in this part.
For the sake of a beautiful picture, you can see it.
And so well that it ends well, history has clearly outlived itself.
5 out of 10
When choosing a picture to view, I very often recall ' instructions ' my brother about how to approach the viewing of the picture. Not only good movies, but also absolutely bad ones. After all, it is on the example of the latter, the first seem really good pictures and disappears ' snob effect'. In this case, my choice fell on this film directed by James Foley.
The plot of the picture logically continues the events of the previous two parts and we can even say that sums up the entire trilogy. Putting logical fat points in the relationship of Anastasia Steele and Christian Gray. At the same time, the creators of the tape again stepped on the same rake as in the previous part ' franchises'.
Similar to the previous part, the plot of the picture is conditionally and actually bifurcated from the very beginning of the tape. On the one hand, talking about the next stage of the love relationship between Anastasia and Christian. On the other hand, trying to bring elements of a thriller with a mysterious pursuer and detractor to the picture. At the same time, the docking of both storylines turned out to be so rough that each of the storylines willingly rejects the other throughout the film.
Moreover, the on-screen conflict with the detractor, as well as the motives of the latter turned out to be so stupid and childishly stupid that it is not only difficult to watch the events taking place on the screen seriously. But it's impossible. In a sense, the situation is saved by the fact that the relationship Anastasia and Christian come in the main stronghold, which was the Easter egg of the first tape. Propagating concepts of love and family values. But the creators of the tape were so carried away by this that they forgot about the foundation of the first part of Christian’s transformation turned out to be extremely unconvincing and far-fetched. Including the almost complete absence of BDSM elements, which were seemingly the main feature of the first tape. However, it was not necessary in the previous and this part. Like making a cartoon about Tom and Jerry without Jerry himself.
As in the previous part, the director James Foley saves the situation. Being a clipmaker with great experience in the past, as well as an experienced visionary, Foley throughout the film puts no film, how much a very stylish, colorful, spectacular and really beautiful video clip. Perfectly selecting music for it, competently building a screen composition and even scenes of an erotic nature, presenting very beautifully.
However, it was the lack of awareness of what kind of film the filmmakers are shooting that completely pumped up. For an action thriller, the picture did not have enough sharpness and turned out to be too much ' snotty' sentimentality. As for melodrama, the elementary dramaturgy, which would allow at least somehow to take seriously what is happening on the screen. Rather than as a reproduction ' candy and bouquet' the period of the newlyweds.
Dakota Johnson and Jamie Dornan did not play well. But the characters were completely boring. Especially the heroine of Johnson, whose transformation from a proud and independent person into a full 'submessive' in the finale of the tape looks extremely far-fetched. I was not impressed by Eric Johnson, who squandered all potential and appeared on the screen as an absolutely pathetic villain. It hurts most of all for the excellent actress Marsha Jay Harden, who is very little in the picture, and given the quality of the picture, maybe even fortunately.
3 out of 10
Fifty Shades of Freedom is the long-awaited and logical conclusion of a sensational and scandalous trilogy, which unfortunately repeated all the mistakes of its predecessor. Representing a really colorful, beautiful and stylish video clip. Rather than any semblance of a feature film with a reasonable script. Absolutely repulsing it is the last that the script is very difficult to call.
This film belongs to the genre of erotic melodrama. Mrs. Gray and Mr. Gray constantly have sex. American Suite class eroticism. Christian has an excellent alpha male body, Anastasia has the breasts of a European luxury prostitute. In short, two beautiful bodies constantly want to copulate. The main characters have everything: youth, desire, money. And all this envy some maniac.
Mrs. Gray is haunted by an old acquaintance, a former editor at the publishing house she works for. The motives of the maniac in the film are not disclosed. The ghosts of the past have returned to the lives of the Greys. Writer Erica James, based on the novels of which the trilogy 'Shades...' and the script for this picture is written, pays more attention to the pregnancy of Mrs. Gray, the reaction to this her husband. The topic of “unwanted pregnancy” in wealthy families is raised. Mr. Gray isn't ready for his wife's pregnancy: he hasn't played BDSM yet. Constantly fuck young and without a condom: what will be the result clear to everyone?
Praise the modern gadgets with GPS-navigators!!! Mrs. and Mr. Gray text each other all the time. Without a modern gadget, the heroes begin nervousness. Thanks to the GPS, Mr. Gray will save his wife from a maniac. Hail the gadgets!! Free the spouses of Grey give a huge amount of money Christian: a diamond ring Mrs. Grey in 8 carats, a sports car Audi R-8, an old house. Everything is luxurious, everywhere there is a lot of money - it is time to multiply and reproduce heirs.
In the film 'Fifty Shades of Freedom' Mrs. Gray makes all the decisions, Christian was left in the second roles to be content with being the father of the heir to his empire. The music in the film is magnificent, corresponds to the erotic mood of the picture. Music opens and gives shades to the world of luxury and sex that surround the main characters. One stroke of a magic wand and at the feet of Anastasia a huge house, five million dollars, a sports car. This is freedom and its 50 shades.
For the third time on the same rake, the world is rapidly dumb
If the first time you removed a boring tape, the second time even duller, then according to all the laws of logic, you must gather your ... um ... your talent in a fist and give out a spectacle that will take the breath away from everyone. And these critics and haters will shut up and weep in complete powerlessness.
No what? That's right. Why the hell bother? Fans are already eating, they will ask for supplements, but the dissatisfied looked, scolded. Still, everything seems to be fine. Not great.
As a viewer, I am very sorry. The authors in the description of the film had to put a warning ' only for people without a brain' It’s not there, so I got the impression that the authors didn’t try to work well because they don’t respect their viewers and think they’re idiots.
So what do we have?
is completely missing. Fired as unnecessary. He had never been there before, somehow managed. Who did he give up at all when we have eroticism here, you know?
Erotic: I have never seen a more depressing sight. No, I did. In Soviet cinema. Even then, the bed scenes were more powerful. Not technically, emotionally.
The main characters: To give credit, the main character is prettier, no longer looks like an aging alcoholic, as in the very beginning of the epic. The main character, he sometimes looks like he forgot where he is, or reads social networks behind the scenes. Organicity, like pairs, is still there at zero.
Secondary characters: Who am I? What am I doing here? Why am I here? You don't know either?
Author's decisions and creative moves: Clinical. Period. Okay, I'm putting it on. Just the formula 'I see it that way' in this case, it won't work. Techniques, turns of action, shooting plans (often unsuccessful) – all this we have seen in the first two parts. Is it new? Oh, no, that's not it.
Music: This time they drained and flushed down the toilet what was good in the previous series of this with the permission to say masterpiece. If before the music was normal, it is quite possible to survive, then this time - a nightmare and horror.
Other:Decorations, costumes, cars and equipment - no complaints. Beautiful, stylish, expensive.
Dry residue: That's bad. It used to be simple ' no way', ' so go,' ' once goes,' The third part is bad. To collect in one tape at once so many platitudes and stupidities from tabloid novels, it is necessary to manage.
Recommendations: Take a look. For general development. Preferably without sound (from these dialogues can be slightly nauseous) and on accelerated rewinding.
Since the authors showed that bad movies can be made worse, they deserved an honorable assessment.
3 out of 10
Well, we made the third film of the acclaimed story. The next film adaptation of the book now called “Fifty Shades of Freedom” puts an end to the story of Anastasia’s heroes and her rich lover, who loves hard sex. The hype surrounding this film quickly passed after the second failed film. Nothing was expected from the third film adaptation, but I wanted to see it so that the whole story finally developed.
We see how happy the main characters are and they are together. Anastasia got everything she could dream of. Christian loves her, she is happy, and in addition to her personal life, and at her favorite job, everything is fine. Darkens the sweet life of lovers, their enemy from the past, who dreams of killing Anastasia. The girl’s life is in danger, and we see another test (the last) through which Christian and Anastasia must go to finally live happily.
A beautiful life is not forbidden. That’s what you think of when you watch this movie. The picture is incredibly arrogant, pathetic, but this is what we expected from her. The most discouraging thing about it is that the plot is horribly implausible. Everything looks unrealistic and pleasant. This picture is exclusively for teenagers who want to see the beautiful, sweet life of the rich. The movie itself is dull and gray in fact, I would call this film – a beautiful void.
The middle is terribly boring, and I wanted to rewind, the ending seemed to give dynamism and something dramatic, but no, it did not work. In general, the film is a failure and kills with its stupidity. This is one of the loudest and most failed adaptations in Western cinema.
The duet of Dakota Johnson and Jamie Dornan at first glance is beautiful and passionate, but it is just a bright and beautiful cover, inside it is empty. Play actors at the level of kindergarten and terribly overplay. The daughter of the famous American respected actress Meloni Griffith Dakota Johnson thanks to the trilogy of 50 shades gained dubious fame and showed low and bad acting. As for Dornan, I'm not saying anything. He deserves the gold raspberries, which we hope will be presented to him. As for the erotic scenes that the viewer expects from this part, you can also call something empty.
Fifty Shades of Freedom is an American melodrama with a taste of drama and now a thriller of 2018. The third film adaptation (which is not surprising) failed and turned out to be a pathetic, empty and completely unnecessary film. The first picture was treated with curiosity, but still negatively, the second part was a resounding failure, the third as well as the second on the same level. This film has no cinematic value, and I say no to it.”
After n-amount of time after the release of this opus on the screens I still & #39; pressed my own song & #39; and decided to spend time watching. What if it's interesting? Yeah -- not with that trilogy. We're done, thank God. Unlike the previous books, I didn’t finish the third one. Well, boring, and a lot of boocuffs. Yeah, no story. Logic and justification in this creation did not bring at all. So let's all figure out what is in this film and what is not.
There's a beautiful picture. Nature. Luxury houses. Everything is so bright. A hint that Mr. Gray's gray tones are behind us. It's a funny music in the background, I must say that it was always in place. Like music is a plot engine (the plot is not, do not forget).
From what I read in the book and compared it to the film, it became clear that the 300 pages of the opus were drastically reduced. They cut a lot of scenes and the action moved at such a pace that someone was chasing the crew. Is it really the elusive Jack Hyde?
The action in the film really changed dramatically. Not having time to properly solve one problem, another immediately appeared. Everyone forgot about the previous one. So what didn't you finish? You have to move the action, change the picture. Fast, fast, fast.
The stormy activity did not save the plot. Oh, yes, the plot is missing.
A little more about the picture on the screen. In almost every scene, the viewer close-ups shoved Ana’s ring with a large stone. The ring was literally in my eyes! What did you want to prove? Family ties, love, wealth?
Christian and Anastasia discuss future children after returning from their honeymoon. Aren't they talking about it before the wedding? Ana constantly tells how she wants to work, but at every opportunity she can throw the client and get out of the workplace. Christian, earning millions, does nothing but shepherd his wife. When does he get to work? And what kind of businessman is he if he drops meetings and runs to scold a rebellious wife? L-logic. The writers have not heard.
The heroine is so eager to cut her husband that she does not even change clothes and portrays a hairdresser right in a narrow skirt and transparent blouse. (Or on the costumes this time they decided to save money.) Christian hires all members of the family security, but Hyde takes care of them all. Maybe he's smarter than Christian. And when did this humble womanizer-editor so master the knowledge of a programmer? That's all I've ever done. Anastasia informs Christian about the pregnancy, he is dusting. Well, what did you want, honey, because it was discussed and wanted to wait? She messed up, forgetting about the doctor (ah, the business lady was very busy) and sulking at her husband.
And of course, the main action, with the abduction of Mia. Who's our superhero? Guards? Christian? You didn't! Anastasia! Of course the cool guys didn't make it, but she did. Alone! Oh, how! Logic? No, they didn't. And after receiving a couple of blows in her face, she lies in the hospital almost dying. This whole kidnapping thing didn't blow a tear. There was no tension. Well, the final vanilla cutting (Twilight smelled).
There was no chemistry between the actors. Two dolls, no emotions. Pronouncing text. And at the sight of 'games' Dakota Johnson-facepalm rules. She can't play! Let him stay out of it. Her presence on the screen causes a desperate yawn.
Sex? It was like there were two bodily movements on the screen. One tried to portray passion and moan, the second was responsible for these very movements. Boring.
What do you think of this opus?
2 out of 10
1 ball for music and nature, and 1 for finally finishing.
The tape is as modest as Miss Steele's wedding dress, as faint as Jamie Dornan's play, as vulgar as the nun's skirt. A barely hidden erotic melodrama, which is trying to show a luxurious life in combination with sex, where they do not even smell!
You know, if you look at the movie, it's like a comedy. Then I laughed well in different episodes, because the game was sucked out of the finger, and the plot twists were glued together so nasty that the question begged: Not Tommy Wiseau, the director? Oh, sorry, "The Room" is a masterpiece! There's a wretched parody here. By the way, if you remember what “50 shades” is, then it is not quite a snot, where is BDSM? Where are the sadomasochistic tendencies? Everything turned into pink, funny scenes, where you will be shown a little ass, and the nipple will be raked! The main part of the film is the bed scenes. And in this part, they look so crazy, boring and not depraved that when watching, I want to tell the main characters what to do. The story of Cinderella's dash of vigilante comes to an end, where they still slap a friend and go into the sunset with a leather lash in their hand. Only the moments in the picture are boring, and there is no drama. For example, there are family quarrels that disappear as if nothing had happened, it seems that the main characters live in their own world and for them, relationships are just an abstraction that does not hurt feelings. Heroes behave delusionally, like robots that are not characteristic of humanity. Yes, the predictability of the tape at a height, it is not difficult to guess what to what and what comes out of it.
The idea of the movie is interesting, but! If only you could tell us something else, where everything is not so for children, where there are two adults (or at least one!), in order to somehow carry us away. But no, the dialogue is bad, the characters are weird. The game! My God! Yes Stanislavsky is resting, but I want to note that in this part Dakota does a little better. Jamie But lags behind on all fronts, then smiles stupidly, then rolls out his eyes, then stands like a fool, not knowing what to answer! I'm sorry, Dornan, but your brutal beard wasn't enough for a hobby.
Watching the tape, I asked one question: What did Christian Grey find in Anastasia? What did she do to him? Considering that there were so many women in his life who looked like two drops of water, why this one? No answer! Because the characters Non-written!
I don’t recommend watching, but if you’ve seen the first two, you’ll want to see this one. But you know how it all ends.
I will make a couple of clarifications at once: all the books I read out of curiosity ' what people breathe', all the films are viewed.
So let's start with an orgy.
The plot is incredible
Anastasia and Christian are together forever. Happy, married, rich and sexually active. But there's one bad person who's bothering them. But not too much.
The mix of genres is also incredible.
There are tears (even Christian has dropped a couple of tears), there are terrible problems in their family life, because once he got drunk, there is a dark past and an uncertain future.
Romantics - of course. The beginning of the film looks like a pop video clip or night fantasies of a teenage girl.
Detective - Yeah, exactly. Anastasia and Christian in breaks build versions, work out motives, unravel an incredible tangle of mysteries and mysteries, leading straight to Gray's childhood. Direct ' detective agency ' Falcon and whore'' (c)
Thriller/fighter/fighter is also available. Fearless Anastasia goes straight into the clutches of the villain, who has no plan, no brains, only an unhealthy obsession with Christian. Bonus: shootout, chase in cool cars (almost 'Fast and Furious'), surveillance.
BDSM - in excess. While watching, my brain was screaming, 'Red! Red!' but the hand didn't turn off. It's itself a BDSM.
But seriously: '50 shades of freedom' - one of the most striking examples of absurdity and meaninglessness. The primary source will be an excellent gift for any psychiatrist, you can write dissertations, starting either from the characters or from an adult woman who has such heresy in her head.
Christian Gray - the first film still somehow tries to promote the harsh macho image of Gray as a sadist and dominant, here the image of a man is needed in order to constantly show where his place is. Personality is not worked out absolutely, there is no disclosure of the character or development. It doesn't make you want to empathize. It is not enough to invent some past there with a bad mother and a depraved aunt, you also need to sculpt a real person out of this porridge.
Anastasia Steele - don't know what. It plays the card of a modest maid, then twists Gray's balls. To ' I love-can't-#39; then 'sorry-goodbye' What's in my head is unknown. But there is a fashionable feminist message that will spoil many more impressionable girls. Anastasia kind of hints - pretend, rape your brains, demand romance from a sadist and everything will work out, because you are GG and in general a goddess.
Logic is no logic. In the day 96 hours, because the main characters have time to work (as often repeated ' hard & #39; because they are talented), immediately hang out in clubs, and in breaks shade in all places. Scenes and dialogues are mentally sent back to the past, to B/C films. A kind of frivolous erotica, where everything goes in the background, just to show a close-up of the nipple once every half hour.
The characters have no motivation, the film has meaning, the actors have an understanding of what is happening.
It is clear that the work is a manifesto of a bored housewife. An ode to female strength, unspent potential and unquenchable ambition. Anastasia is a self-portrait. I came, I saw, I twisted my balls, I won. The author dragged her husband to the set, forced to write a script. Why no one will help him or save him is a mystery. Maybe he just doesn't know the stop words.
Starting as a fan fiction to 'Twilight' it turned into something more terrifying. The graphomaniac porn monster took over publishing houses and spread around the world. The story of a vampire and a teenage girl was sweet and naive, fitting the YA category. But in which category to include '50 OS'?
Despite all this, the studio got its money.
The directors tried to do something, at least a beautiful picture.
Dakota Johnson and Jamie Dornan tried to honestly work out and play this schizophrenia.
The triumph of Anastasia Grey, or the most sluggish erotic underdetective of the XXI century
At one time, the film adaptation of the first part 'Fifty Shades' made no less noise than the release of the books themselves. Fans of ' sharp' it was terribly interesting to penetrate the world of BDSM and sleep with a sick billionaire. To which Erica Leonard James, the author of the franchise, enlisting the support of grief-cinematographers, showed a greasy kukish, turning the alluring, hot, controversial & #39; rod' into an ordinary woman's melodrama about how to turn from an ugly duckling into a queen, and at the same time tame an imperious, hot king.
First of all, of course, it is worth remembering that the film has its own unspoken genre. It is called 'bestseller squeeze'. Screenings are different: some directors radically change the plot, leaving the idea; others try to retell the story in their own words; third enough to remove a couple of unnecessary lines and almost peripheral reproduce what happened. James Foley once again fell into the third category. The advantage of this approach is that the terribly dull, godlessly drawn, horribly sentimental prose of Erica James turned into a set of advertising pictures, which can be perceived either with boredom or with laughter, but at least without the desire to cut veins.
In ' Shades of Freedom' we are entering that long-awaited stage, which is called ' becoming a modern woman'. Anastasia Steele - sorry, now Grey - managed in a fairly short time to turn her dominant into a rag and, of course, exclusively at the cost of her charm, solely due to her wayward character, exclusively without any other exceptions, to become a Lady Boss, able to cope with any stalemate situation. Well done! Now the newlyweds have to face completely banal family problems, and along the way have time to fuck and escape from the persecution of the insidious villain - Jack Hyde. Moreover, the persecution, sometimes resting on the alleged detective, does not prevent our frightened sheep to spend their free time for their pleasure as if their lives are not in danger. Right, what is the point of worrying: they will kill and kill, think. It all looks extremely stupid, awkward and unjustifiably glamorous, even to the point of nausea.
The notorious BDSM is given no more than ten percent of timekeeping. That was the case in the book, but you know what? You have to make good movies out of bad books, not vice versa! Alas, the cult of sex, for which they were created ' Shades', is presented here as in magazines a la ' Cosmopolitan' - an inept note in the margins. If I ever get a man who says he understood BDSM through the work of E. L. James or the subsequent film adaptations, I’ll laugh right in the face. Such a useless presentation of a popular sexual direction is simply impossible to find in the whole world. Even in children's fairy tales there is more BDSM than here, so I suggest that we close this topic altogether and return to our 'rams' if they are wrong.
A little more time is given to pictures of a gorgeous life. And now it is worth slapping people in the face who do not divide cinema into male and female. Friends whose cheek is burning right now! How not to divide, if the creators of such a slag intentionally tear their ass, so that the movie turned out to be as narrowly focused as possible - studded flowers, dotted with butterflies, moistened with tampons?! Here it is, another imitation of the Big Dream of all the fair sex, aspiring to get married & #39; for the fart & #39;: in the first part we flew in a helicopter, in the second we sailed on a steamer, in the third we traveled the whole world, but at the same time no one broke our stubborn spirit, did not gain control, and let the girl go to the forest who dared to assume that we agree with his betroths for money! Alas, such a road will go to the whole sane part of the planet, who saw in the licked to the brilliance of the footage a clear manipulation of fragile girl minds.
But not a million people are alive: in addition to sex and ' bawling' we are waiting for a series of typically female tantrums, a couple of unexpected turns (actually very expected) and, damn it, a parody of a real thriller. The most insulting thing is that all potentially interesting scenes that had a chance to break into the consciousness of the viewer a free bird and settle there for a few happy minutes, starting for health, rapidly fall from a height to the bottom. You, for example, watch the intense chase, then something terrible happens, and... boom! Peace comes immediately. You are waiting for the incredible orgasm of the main characters, who have already managed to portray a fierce passion, and... Couple moans, montage gluing, next episode. We are again skillfully led by the nose, after which they hit the rolled lips with a brick with a sweep, which makes you feel not only deceived, but also insulted. Obviously, this is not the effect you expect from high-quality eroticism.
And, traditionally, the final. In previous installments, he had the right to be open, to leave intrigue, perhaps even a semblance of a cliffhanger; now, given that the franchise was rounded, nothing new was invented for us, except to announce the triumph of family, love and loyalty, turning the movie into an advertisement for yogurt (though without mentioning the name of the brand). Happiness, joy, beauty! No words. I'm going to the bathroom. You probably know why.
And in the end... Yay, comrades! The story of Anastasia and Christian will no longer torture us! This severe female fairy tale has successfully outlived itself, leaving a sour aftertaste, fading bewilderment and sincere joy - from the fact that you will no longer have to take it for ' an encyclopedia on BDSM' some snotty melodrama.
The handcuffs are removed, the shackles are torn, the red pain room is closed for restoration. Let's separate, my good ones.
Here comes the end of the battle of the army of fans with the superior forces of the legion of haters. Anastasia marries her prince from the red room, and the franchise brings the golden creators final profits. The triquel focuses on the struggle of the main characters with the ghosts of the past and one particularly raging detractor. Christian and Anastasia make the last leap before the well-deserved epilogue from the category of “they lived happily ever after”.
It is difficult to distinguish any disadvantages of the third film, since the main problems of this “movie” stretch the red line throughout all parts.
First, you need to reason sensibly - the main feature of the book franchise is not in a naive love story, but in a special kind of strawberry. From the film adaptation expected some soft porn, but in fact did not even turn out smart soft eroticism.
Secondly, some characters have problems with their heads. Instead of the brain, logical and motivational holes grow with frantic force.
Thirdly, the taste and color of the comrade is not, but Dakota Johnson in the lead role from an aesthetic point of view is difficult to imagine the object of such crazy lust. There isn’t even a classic transformation of a squirrel into a BDSM queen (in this case). Her image looks almost ridiculous against the background of a handsome multibillionaire with an athletic physique and professional skills in almost all areas of life.
The trilogy is often accused of manipulating its audience through a primitive love story and baser instincts. On the one hand, it is difficult to argue with this, but everything is known in comparison. It seems that people scolding “50 shades” are not familiar with the “smell” of Russian romantic comedies, where the apotheosis of low-grade obscenity is elevated to absolute. The franchise occupies its niche, which will never go anywhere: a female movie about a rich and carefree life with a passionate handsome boy. The trilogy brings neither good nor bad to the history of cinema, as it simply meets the consumer demands of its time. One-point scores are a stupid and unreasonable hat from individuals with a maximalist mindset.
5 out of 10
With relief or sadness (as you wish), but you can breathe full – the trilogy about the difficult love between Mr. Gray and Miss Steele is completed. There was enough for everyone: against the background of expensive houses, cars and other paraphernalia of beautiful and sembling life, then the volcano, then the geyser, the relationships of the heroes boiled, thereby generating many reasons for secret dreamy sighs of young and naive hearts and lavish slander from all those who accidentally or solely out of curiosity found themselves in the audience of the cinema. But for all its volume and scope, the final chord, which was the third film " 50 shades of freedom", turned out to be nothing more than a bright puff, unable to at least gain a foothold in cinematic memory.
Authors whose heads are filled with dreams about Cinderella's fabulous love fortune tend to sit in a puddle, fantasizing the continuation of the story after the phrase "and they lived happily ever after." To come up with a more or less interesting plot frame and fill it with urgent and at the same time profound problems, add touches of reality to the images of the characters turns out to be a task almost unattainable. So come out of the pen of a story like this, where happy spouses in between their sluggishly sophisticated games babbling about some minor moments, giving them a scale really significant, solely for the sake of at least some filling of the time allocated according to the script. Whether you like it or not, the action itself is begging to not restrain yourself and express your legitimate “fe!”. And even if there was a powerful electric charge between the actors, even if the storyline itself was no-no and shone with originality, even if the time was not stretched so clumsily and sadly ... maybe all the sins would be paid off then with more than a lot. But no. Cardboard, superficial, twilight. And most importantly – boring (a devastating blow to those pitiful remnants of virtues, with difficulty drawn from the film). And that cutting of memories about the rich history of the relationship of the main characters, which is served in the final in the form of a cherry on top of a cream curl, involuntarily makes you shrink in the chair from an unpleasant feeling of déjà vu and a loud grinding of sugar on your teeth.
From curiosity, not one cat died and not one person was injured. Fortunately, all this scathing about the shades of whatever it is - not the worst thing that can happen to the viewer, sincerely believing that any, even the deadliest story can make a great movie.
4 out of 10
Instead of a preface, I would like to give you some information that I consider necessary for this review. I have my own rating of films, in which at this minute there are exactly 1808 films, each of which has its own score on a 100-point scale. If you go down to the bottom, you can see that the lowest rating are two films that I consider the worst creations that defame world cinema. One of them is “Defenders” by Sarik Andreasyan, who became a super-failure in the field of Russian superhero cinema. The second - "Fifty Shades Darker" - a sequel to the sado-maso-love melodrama, whose direct sequel today fell on the cutting table of the Kinonista. (Further after each mentioned film in brackets will be its score from the above rating)
The very first "Fifty Shades of Grey" (17) looked like a commercial move to collect easy money, attracting viewers with an erotic ban on the big screen. No one was surprised by the fact that the plot and its characters were completely worthless. When creating the second part, the authors completely trusted the inertia of the movement on residual fuel, thoroughly scoring all the rules and canons of art cinema, filling the picture with an unreal number of stupid situations and dialogues. Thanks to this, the trip to the final of the trilogy could be expressed only by the phrase “go to sneer”, and the main intrigue was to find out whether it was possible to make a film even worse than it was already. It was so bad that there was nothing worse.
There is a film made by Finnish amateurs called Killer Rabbit (22) and belongs to the so-called low-budget thrash genre. In it, a long-eared mutant, played by a man in the wretched suit of a growth doll, ran through snow-covered forests and killed vacationers not without the help of his hypertrophied genitals. To see to the end this disgusting spectacle is not given to everyone, but even here the plot tension is present to a greater extent than in the third “Shades”. Although, it would be more correct to say: “The tension is present”, because in the story of Anastasia and Christian they do not even smell.
In any work, there must be something that will move the story, before the heroes must appear some problems, conflicts arise, the solution of which makes the plot a plot as such. But what do we see? In the scenario, there are several beginnings of such situations that have no end. The heroes fought, but the next morning there was no scandal. By the evening, the fight was even more intense, however, and it also somehow hushed up. Finally, at some point, their relationship still gives a strong crack, promising either divorce or beautiful feats to restore a love affair. But even then, the problem somehow miraculously resolves itself. Question: Why create conflicts in the plot, which then everyone around thoroughly “scores”?
A Russian film insult called “Crimea” (13) came out last year and became a perfect example of how to shoot in any case. Low-grade naivety, multiplied by highly concentrated stupidity, seasoned with sweet and tasteless patriotic feces, formed an inedible cocktail, which is contraindicated to use. But even in the abundance of phrases from which the ears wilt and curl up into tubes, there is no such outright idiocy that flies from the lips of the heroes of Shades. One scene evokes a hysterical laugh that most good comedies will envy. During the next love pleasures, Christian chains his passion and takes out one of the phallic toys from the cherished box. And so, a second before applying the device for its intended purpose, to put it mildly, lower the tea bag into a mug, he says the line: "Now you will know how I feel." And that one phrase is ten times more laughable than all the other jokes put together.
And thus, none of the most blatantly bad films can compete with Shades in their worthlessness and complete lack of hints of anything good. Rzhevsky vs. Napoleon (22) is more interesting, Dislike (12) is smarter, and Best Film 2 (24) is better in every sense. Even “Green Elephant” (17), for all the disgust that causes a director devoid of minimal professionalism, looks more whole and not devoid of meaning picture. And the famous trilogy “Human centipede” (41, 28 and 32) would generally receive an Oscar in all categories, if its only competitor was the trilogy “Fifty shades”.
Of course, one amendment must be made. I don’t want to offend the many people who were forced to work on this film. Statisticians, cameramen, artists, decorators, costume designers – all these and many other Hollywood specialists just did their job, and did it well. The main complaint to “Shades” is how expensive and bombastic the audience sell this tasteless abomination. After all, all those examples of various author’s thrash, sullen comedies and unsuccessful horror films that were mentioned in this review at least did not try to claim something highly artistic.
But Shades went public with the proud posture of a potential conqueror of audience hearts, high up his nose and wearing a catchy and decorated with a thousand diamonds evening dress. Bright makeup, a spectacular hairstyle, a platinum necklace on an open neck, the fifth size of the chest at the aspen waist - all this boldly stands on long studs before the start of the red carpet. But this chic and overly confident person begins to move forward. And at the very first step in full growth, the clumsy muzzle falls forward and stretches in the center of universal attention. And it turns out that she can't walk on heels, her waistline is bruised with a corset, and four out of five breast sizes are push-up-cheat. The wig hides rare hair with bald hair, tons of makeup camouflage pimples and wrinkles, the necklace is a silver fake, and a thousand bruliches on the dress are the cheapest glass.
However, even being a universal laughing stock, Madame “Shades” again rises to her feet and, as if nothing had happened, continues to go forward, retaining her former proud posture and raising her nose even higher. People are laughing harder. And laughs not only all the sheer falsity and inability to move crooked legs, but also the same cocky nose, from which every step lower and lower hangs a large and very unpleasant snot. And there's one big bewilderment on all the faces. Well, does it not reach a person that if you do not pick up your nose so much, then the snot will not be so visible.
But there is only one circumstance that can generate a bit of optimism after watching. Fifty Shades of Freedom is the end. It's the final. This is the end of the trilogy. It's freedom from all the fifty shades we'll never see again. At least I want to believe it.
Fifty Shades of Financial Freedom or “Congestion, Rings, Two Guns”
One can talk endlessly about the modern consumer society and the scale of propaganda of such a way of life. And in the eyes and ears of TV programs, advertising, Instagram feeds, social networks, etc. pour the modern layman examples of how his life should be arranged. This film, like a solid advertising of wealth, shouts to young girls about what a relationship should look like, what the perfect guy should look like and what an all-encompassing love he should love, even if the girls themselves do not correspond to this (does it matter? you just need to believe in yourself!). And for young people, the film constantly and very intrusively tells which brand you need to have a car to be in status and successful.
Forgetting about its main concept, the highlight set in the trailers and stories of fans of the first part, the film finally rolled soap opera with beautiful pictures of a luxurious lifestyle, almost without bothering even with bed scenes with a “fresh look at sexual relations”. There will be no barriers that the heroes must overcome, no problems, no conflicts, no Dreiser details about the sources of Christian’s wealth, the problems of achieving and retaining it. As such, only Anastasia is engaged in the film, Christian just walks around the city, appears in unexpected places, makes surprises and buys up his favorite houses.
What the authors give in the film as a plot to call such will not work even with a huge stretch. In my opinion, the plot in the ridiculous porn movies of the 90s has more meaning and twists than here. Have you ever seen the main villain, whose machinations do not affect the main character, and the “decisive fight” occurs without his participation at all? No changes and overcoming heroes, no bets on life and death, no intrigue and unexpected turns. And what mystery to talk about when a villain who wants revenge goes ahead and acts alone, without even trying to hide himself?
I want to add a couple of points only for the fact that the actors tried to portray something with all their might, despite what a ridiculous and contradictory task was set before them.
3 out of 10
All the same paradoxical films these shades ... They pour dirt on them with buckets, they understand that this is a wretched and stupid movie, but they regularly go to theaters.
Why? To make the series even more hateful? Maybe. Or will you be sure that another movie is right? Quite. Maybe for fun? Yeah, that's for me.
I didn’t expect anything great, I just wanted to laugh from my heart at this stupidity, but for the last time.
Again a rotten plot, dead and just no. Intrigues were sucked from the last bones of the eaten dish. The denouement to the limit is stupid and it does not make a more feature film.
The characters and the actors themselves did not show any minor progress, but rather a regression, especially "Mr. Grey." One psychologist friend said that the idea of the book in terms of the psyche of Christian and the reasons for its formation is interesting, but sinks in the screen slime of glamour and pretended lust like DiCaprio in the cold waters of the North Atlantic.
"Miss Grey" in previous films was a gray, wooden empty space, now she's a funny and stupid empty space. It was fun to watch from the first part how from frame to frame position and money change this character (although there is almost nothing to change if nothing). In this part, Anastasia will finally break through the voice and the bark will fly one after another. It is better to keep silent about stupidity, otherwise spoilers cannot be avoided.
There's a lot of yaps again. The funniest thing is Gray's pumping. In half of the nude scenes, the actor is pre-pumped, in order to be more muscular for the aesthetics of the frame and soaking in its place with devoted fans. In the other half, the actor is in his natural state. Recall the cult 300, where the actors similarly scored muscles before shooting and scenes without pumping there is practically no.
I was also happy to translate messages on phone screens. You type in the English layout of SMS, and Russian words appear. The terrible dream of the “cursed pendos”.
Scenes of sex like a worn record of a phonograph - nothing new and interesting does not give. Secondary oral caresses in the kitchen are generally fun.
With the sound this time was a major loss. If from the previous parts in the phone flew one or two songs for joint listening with the second half, then all the tracks flew past the ears.
The image of a beautiful and rich life, as always, is on top. A ton of greasy glamour keeps him from falling. And the most important advantage is the opportunity to laugh at all this from the heart.
However, you can touch the "feelings" of loyal fans and fans (crossed)...
Of course, '50 shades of gray' is a hyperbole and mass market. The whole film, the book, the whole idea, is black and white, from extreme to extreme, and from fire to fire. The third film was no exception. The far-fetched, unfounded and insane passion of the heroes, who even have flaws idealized or elevated to the absolute, beautiful erotic picture, the level of ideality and sweetness, which goes overboard, has already become a tradition of this trilogy. But...
I am sure that despite all the unreality of what is happening, the film is very instructive. It makes us recall the correct model of relations, long forgotten in society, where a man and a woman perform social roles inherent in nature. Gray is strong, he is willing to take responsibility, to protect, he goes crazy when he cannot protect Ana from a sudden attempt on her life. Ana is weak and strong at the same time. Her strength lies in her weakness. A real man she bribes, fascinates in love. She takes care of her man. They can afford any stylist, any cook - but Ana cooks dinner herself, and she cuts her man's hair. Ana can relax all day long, alternating social events and travel - but she continues to work at the publishing house, so that Christian could admire her personality. Today, in a world where a man is allowed (and even encouraged) to be weak, and a woman to be emancipated, tough, strong, accept and bear the burden of decisions made for two with a smile, the heroes of this simple (but only at first glance) film is worth learning.
The third part was the perfect conclusion to the trilogy. She revealed the heroes, showed the inner strength of each. The performers of the roles of Ana and Christian perfectly embodied the book characters. Dakota Johnson is very beautiful. The choice of caste when I watched the first film was not clear to me. I thought Alexis Bledel with his perfect canonical beauty and fragile figure would be the perfect Ana Steele. But how wrong I was, and how much the casting director guessed. For the third part, I've tasted the beauty of Dakota - you believe that this is the only way to tame the heart of the great and terrible Christian Grey. She has character and become. Jamie Dornan, who at first appeared to be just a well-learned model, showed different facets of his character in the third part - yes, he is strong in life, but weak in relationships.
The performers of other roles in the third film are the perfect scenery in the utopian world of the ideal love of the main characters. Villain Jack is intimidating in the trailer, however, the actor failed to give his character either motivation or charisma. He plays the sad role of a spoonful of tar in a barrel of honey.
Watch? Definitely. In the warm company of friends, sisters, mothers, and only. This film is a girl's utopia, and real relationships in the modern world will be harmful. The best, as we know, is the enemy of the good.
My curiosity will ruin me, that's for sure. But I made a promise to watch this 'genius' franchise to try to form an objective opinion about this xm... film, so to speak.
Well, especially for people like me, I probably made this movie. And for a whole bunch of girls 15 years and ladies of post-Balzac age, long forgotten how it happens in life. Otherwise, I can't explain why they're watching it. Why remove, it is clear - peeple grooves, and there is never a lot of money.
The third part of this acclaimed work of station art turned out to be even more boring and dull, even compared to the second film. They tried to make eroticism with elements of a thriller, but it turned out even worse than soap serial operas on the Russia 1 channel. It's hard to think of a more boring script, a more stupid scene and dialogue. Everything is so unnatural, so delusional that it seems that the author of this unromancer lived for many years in the forest and has an idea of a rich life only from glossy magazines of the 90s.
Actors in this part do not try at all. Well, why? Screenwriters are not worried, the author of this work too, then why bother them? The fees paid and well, move on.
I don’t know where this lady’s idea of family, marriage, sex, and life in general came from, maybe it was in her dreams when she was 10, but it has nothing to do with the real world or the movie world. What happens on the screen is hard to watch, so hard that I closed my eyes every 5 minutes.
When Twilight & #39 was over, the men rejoiced, and Chuck_review even uncorked a bottle of champagne. Well, guys, we finally waited, and this vulgar misunderstanding is over. That’s probably the best thing this movie could give us. So, on February 23rd, men! And I have nothing more to say about this movie, just a request - do not go to this, then they will shoot less like this. Because this is not a movie at all, but just a 2-hour torture, where nothing happens except pathetic phrases and stupidity.
1 out of 10
In fact, I missed the movie quite a lot, and it’s quite ironic that the first film after a break was a film that didn’t pretend to be a genius. The feeling from it is quite unambiguous: it is a semi-finished product, sketches of something that could turn out interesting, but did not work. Now even the so-called frankness of “Shades” has gone somewhere, so we have what we have.
Throughout the viewing, I did not leave the feeling of amazing naivety with which the lives of the main characters are shown, although it would be worth getting used to: a sweet life with buying planes and throwing money left and right, joint cooking, other expensive quirks of the main characters. Essentially a classic rich prince and Cinderella trying to remake him. Even the disclosure of characters, at least such an attempt, occurs through everyday and gnashing banal conflicts: with strangers, with each other, and for incredibly ordinary reasons. It would seem that the problems that many couples understand, here is only in this case on the screen the conflict of two egoists, which does not allow you to sympathize with either of them, or at least worry about their relationship.
It is almost impossible to single out any main storyline here: the entire film consists of episodes, and the characters that appear here and there disappear as quickly as they appeared. There is no “gun” that can “fire” at the right time. The attempt to bring horror and create a thriller fails due to the absolute ill-consideredness of this storyline. That is, the conditional threat seems to exist, and even in some ridiculous ways tries to realize, but the lives of the heroes almost does not affect, the heroes do not feel it, do not think about it, only sometimes mentioned in conversations. The clash as such, the mental connection between heroes and antiheroes is simply not there. There is some fear, but nothing more. In addition, the “crazy” image of the antihero is created exclusively by visual means, but no more, the actor simply does not have the opportunity to somehow develop the image, show the hero frightening and really dangerous for the couple. As a result, it turns out unconvincing, and the film does not receive the plot core in the form of a thriller.
There is nothing more to say about the content, because there is almost no content. The main pair play smoothly, not well and not bad, but they actually have nothing to play. It is not necessary to talk about a special “chemistry”: there are no feelings on the screen that respond to the heart of the viewer, and there are no experiences that make a lump approach the throat. It's just a household thing. In a beautiful wrapper, in expensive scenery, but communication is everyday and almost primitive, conflicts are exclusively everyday, and there is no central plot at all. The very frankness that was present has almost disappeared, and nothing new and standing in its place has come. So now it turns out to be boring even for the level of a medium-sized series, the weaker this picture looks on the big screen.
However, there is still something to see here. For example, you can watch the costumes of the main character with infinite interest. Usually I almost do not pay attention to such things, but now it is simply impossible not to notice all the variety of dresses, skirts, blouses, jackets, shoes and even bikinis that the heroine wears. With her slender figure in mind, it feels like we're watching an original fashion show rather than a feature film. Traditionally, it is worth saying about a good selection of musical compositions, songs - the soundtrack here is wonderful, executed carefully and tastefully. But about locations, scenery and other things to say something laudable I can not — there are shootings and more beautiful, even if we are talking about films about reality, not about fiction.
Well, it's "Shades," almost a household name. How is it to evaluate a movie lover? ... an openly commercial product that plays on the typical feelings of viewers and their fantasies, not even trying to be original. There is no attempt to take a step forward or at least just to the side. Not that I expected anything else, but it turned out like this. And, well, the meaning of the title of the film about freedom, I did not understand what it is expressed in - especially.
5 out of 10
We all know the strengths and weaknesses of this film. I don't think we should talk about them. Now we are talking about the final part of a great movie. “50 Shades of Freedom” itself says a lot, intriguing only the fans who came, and attracting those who have been with us since the very first part.
If you are interested in luxury, or just the lives of great people, this film is for you.
Before us all the famous Mr. Grey, who is up to his ears in his affairs. And Anastasia, his wife.
The movie will make you think about your present time if you have a couple. Are you doing everything right, and do you like it? The film shows a lot of so-called "sharp" scenes, small quarrels that escalate into something more.
Focus on what to think before you say it. A lot of people might think that it's just pornography with nice music, no, I think it's something much more important, everyone will deduct something new, their own. There are also many beautiful views, a couple of rather funny jokes, from which the hall was torn in places, and how not to touch the “hot” scenes? Yes, they are, absolutely, and they look beautiful, love as nothing.
After watching the movie, I can say one thing, it is worth watching.
Spare no money, and go with your soul mates, friends, or yourself. Because that's what we live for. The film is gorgeous for its ease, so that 2 hours pass unnoticed.
8 out of 10
So came the long-awaited wedding of Anastasia Steele and Christian Grey - yachts, wheelbarrows, Côte d'Azur, handcuffs, it would seem, live and fuck, sorry, rejoice. But since the graphomaniac E. L. James after the first book was not calmed down, some one-time characters are introduced into the plot to interfere with family happiness (there is even the heroine Kim Basinger in the form of a text message) and one villain, the former boss of Anastasia, Mr. Hyde, who is eager to annoy Christian and avenge his spoiled career. So in this dull postcard from a luxurious life, diluted with no less dull sex, signs of an almost spy thriller appear.
Of course, scolding "Fifty Shades" has long become commonplace and every critic considers it his duty to practice slander about this spectacle for undemanding girls with an unstable personal life. But there is a picture and defenders who claim that, they say, there is nothing to spit poison on “Shades”, like it’s just a beautiful fairy tale about love, not pretending to be more. One would agree with this if there was love in this movie, since it cannot be found even under a microscope, no more than a drop of passion, feelings and sincerity. For all the undemandingness of the audience, it is absolutely impossible to believe what is happening here, since the primitive fantasies of E. L. James go against minimal logic, psychology and common sense. For example, the same “9 1/2 weeks” proved that you can not build happiness on one sex and love games, and a saturated person like Mr. Gray would get tired of having sex with Anastasia in a couple of months, since intimate pleasures are the only thing their union is based on. Anastasia also, in fact, attracted him by the fact that she was a pure and sweet girl who eventually turned into a depraved person, no different from his previous passions. Fatigue from each other (although the characters try to portray their passion in the spirit of “every time we have as the first”) is noticeable to the naked eye, there is no spark between the actors, the movements are tortured, the poses are constrained, and judging by the scene with the vibrator (from which Anastasia screamed “ooh, everything, red!”), Christian has his beloved wife, sorry, no longer rises.
Drama is a quiet horror, and although the author was terribly hysterical about dissatisfaction with the script of the first (and not the worst) part, her husband Niall Leonard, whom she attracted in the second film to write the script, coped even worse. What is presented to them as a thriller and like sharp unexpected turns is a complete plot pornography, producing the impression of a parody almost to the “Bondian”, which in vain tries to dilute the scripted water consisting of luxury holidays (we know now how these sluts of yours get to the resorts) and other attributes of a beautiful life. The complication of relations between the characters through far-fetched family problems is also a failed move, since it is not possible to adequately beat even the desire of the heroine to be “free and independent”: Anastasia arranges a scandal, they say, she wildly needs work and she hangs herself from boredom at home, but a day after the call of her husband she throws everything and rushes on a personal plane to rest in the Alps (worked out, poor). But for all the wretchedness of the text, James from Shades could extract a difficult and interesting theme of the dark side of human sexuality and watch how a strong and genuine feeling cures a person from mental pathology. Instead, for the third series in a row, the authors give birth to boring and meaningless glossy snot, which eventually end with a perfectly vulgar final scene in the spirit of yogurt advertising, only rabbits and deer are missing in the clearing, by God! And the only thing that makes this nonsense lookable on the big screen is without fools a very beautiful and juicy picture of the cameraman John Schwartzman, who made a titanic effort to give at least some style and beauty to the film - and Dakota Johnson's body too.
3 out of 10
- No, are you serious? Again? - Common sense asked me in a stir when entering the hall.
- Calm down, this is the last one, I assured him, using my inner voice.
- All right, he seemed reluctant to give in. - Good luck to us.
So, ladies and gentlemen, the final part of the shades came out. At the box office of cinemas are already familiar crowds of girls, standing on hand with their doomed soul mates. Some of them do not even look completely doomed, but rather happy. Probably because this is the last part. But the largest theater hall is already open, the only remaining vacant space is occupied, the advertising is finished, the breath is under wraps - the movie begins.
In order not to waste time, their strength and, of course, not to test our patience, the creators decided to miss all the ridiculous fuss, noisy preparations, the usual disputes, disagreements, always accompanying such a great event, and start immediately with a pleasant, with the wedding of Mr. Gray and Anastasia. After all, the main task of the creators is to quickly lead the viewer to the highlight of this film, without spraying on truly unnecessary second-rate details about the characters and motives of their actions. The creators should rather plunge the viewer into the sea of luxury and sex, that is, in the honeymoon of the newlyweds, which, however, are synonymous. And here, guys, get ready because there's going to be a lot of sex. You will see the main characters in bed, shower, red room, in the parking lot, in the red room, in the apartment of friends on the kitchen table and finally again in the red room. And this is not counting light touches and other exciting movements in a variety of settings. Almost the entire first half of the film consists of this: demonstrations of chic resorts and sexual activity of the couple. Which is not surprising, because history is about this, but it is already habitually disappointing, because quantity does not mean quality.
From time to time, the main characters will be disturbed by Jack Hyde (former boss of Anastasia), insidiously stealing Gray’s personal data, and breaking into the couple’s nest. Details of these hacks and intrusions into almost the most secure places in the world, of course, will be missed. It’s not like “Mission: Impossible” is something. In a series of “shades” in general, everything happens incredibly easily. If you want a new home — please, five million dollars in cash — elementary, my love, one stroke of a magic wand and the whole world at your feet. Well, right, I tell you, there is no need to bother with explanations of various uninteresting nonsense. It is better to proceed to the next intercourse.
As for the actors and their characters. Mr. Gray has not seen any transformation. He, as before, is almost a non-working millionaire, who only does what he meets Anastasia from work at 5 o’clock and takes her to another magical place, as well as jealous, worried, sometimes flies away, but almost immediately returns. His complex character in the second part, apparently, was fully revealed (and your problems, if you don’t understand something there), so Christian can only play the role of the perfect spouse. To the final, Jamie Dornan himself scored a little, and now, smiling, moments like a cute hamster, but this often happens to husbands.
It’s a different story with Dakota Johnson. She went from Miss Steele to Mrs. Grey, and that transformation, I must say, suits her. The ridiculous dress has been struck out of her wardrobe, and now she shines before us in beautiful underwear and chic outfits, selected with exquisite taste. The role of the championship in “Fifty Shades of Freedom” is given to her heroine completely. Anastasia leads, does not obey, devotes a lot of time to work, and in the end, alone saves the future of her family. By the way, it was in the second half of the film that I finally managed to knock out some emotion. Thanks to the well-staged scene with the abduction and play (yes, the game) Dakota Johnson, the denouement looks exciting and spectacular. Personally, I was worried and sympathetic, and the lady sitting next to me was crying in general.
In general, this film, like its predecessors, continues a series of not the most talented adaptations, shot on one of the most talentless books in the world. There is a beautiful picture, good music plays and almost no actors play, there is no semblance of chemistry between the main characters, and sex does not excite. The role of secondary heroes is so small that after a year you forget who they are. But given all its shortcomings, personally, Fifty Shades of Freedom does not cause as much negativity as previous films. Maybe it’s because I’m used to it, maybe it’s the best, or maybe it’s because it’s the last. This is an ordinary fairy tale with a claim to eroticism, which will excite teenagers and dreamers-women, but has absolutely no value in itself.
6 out of 10
Here comes the finale of a dramatic story about a girl who fell in love with a sadist. How did it all end? This question probably worries everyone. Someone finally waited for the end of this nightmare, and someone is upset and depressed by this event, namely the release of the film & #39; Fifty Shades of Freedom & #39; on Russian screens, as the film is the final part. I’ve read all the books on which the films were made, and I was sadly surprised that the director and the entire crew cut down quite a lot of good and meaningful scenes in the three films (especially a lot they cut in the third film). I am not a fan of these films about shades and wanted to see only because of the hype that was going on around this erotic drama.
Only this film I managed to go to the cinema: I was in a pleasant shock from the number of back rows occupied by couples in love (there were a lot of them). After it ended, I couldn’t recover at first: the number of dialogues in this film clearly increased, the bed scenes apparently cut and made them short, changed the locations that allow me to see the world. But one thing has remained the same: this beautiful life of money, power, luxury that we've seen over the course of three films, and it's been shown to us as well. The film acquired a bit of action and thriller, which perhaps it lacked. That was really good. It can also be seen that both Dakota and Jamie tried their best to get emotions of compassion, sadness, jealousy, resentment. Thank you for that: I believed them. As for the film in general, it is not even bad for modern youth, and not for young people either. The film ended logically and I think there will be no sequel. As if, of course, critics did not ' offend' this film, it can not be ' the worst in the history of cinema', well, no way! There have been worse movies. . .
I can recommend this film to everyone I know, because it doesn’t have a heavy meaning: even those who haven’t read the book will understand it. We cannot say with certainty that this is a masterpiece of cinema, as we know that it is not true. But also terrible, full of delirium and illogical it can not be called.
8 out of 10
(I took my scores for the scenes I expected most, but didn’t show them.) )
By the way, the soundtracks of the film are simply unrealistically beautiful, tender, sonorous, especially Love me like you do: fans of the first film will like it.
On the screens came the third part of “50 shades”. To be honest, I only watched the first part and missed the second. So in the review I will compare the final of the trilogy with its beginning.
I remember, after watching the first part, we came to a common opinion with friends - it was too modest for such a film. Now we can say exactly the opposite – too frankly. In the first ten minutes, Dakota Johnson’s completely naked breasts are shown to us in all their glory. Then she appears with enviable regularity throughout the film many, many times, as well as pop and all the other charms. Anyway, guys don't take offense. The girls were a little deprived, only a couple of times showing the ass of Jamie Dornan. Well, let's be content with his swollen torso.
Anyway, what's my point? From modesty and actors, and the authors of the film clearly over the past with the premiere of the first part of the time managed to get rid of. But it didn't. The fine line between eroticism and primitive porn is masterfully observed. Watching the love scene of Christian and Anastasia is interesting in the end. Although from all the variety of BDSM games in the film there was only a blindfold, handcuffs and an ordinary vibrator. More common romance than any other game.
Anastasia has grown up too. It is not the same girl that appears in the first part. It is quite a wife who can shout and be offended and even, offended, go to another room - let the husband worry.
And Christian is the same - throwing money, just like a rich man. He loves his wife and worries too much about her. She quickly gives up when she refuses to fly with him on business. He does not want to share it with the future child, but in the end he is corny happy that this child was born.
The plot does not shine with special genius, and if you cut out all love scenes from the picture, it will become an ordinary passing melodrama. With love, jealousy, pregnancy and fights with former colleagues / friends / acquaintances. But it didn't make him any worse. The viewer knows what the ticket is for. Save and musical accompaniment, which the authors picked up very competently and harmoniously.
But there were some downsides. The first one I want to put to the authors for incredibly stupid guards, from whom an ordinary woman has run away many times. Where did you get those? And the second is for a hospital coma from a single stroke. She was punched in the face and kicked once in the stomach, and she went straight out and some kind of coma? Unbelievable! Especially for those who love action movies, and constantly sees on the screens, how some lady cheerfully throws crowds of peasants, easily dodges bullets and never falls even after fifty powerful blows to the jaw.
Otherwise, a great ending to an interesting story of two lovers.
If we talk about the whole trilogy, cutting out all the sex - then we will have the usual history of Cinderella, such films a huge number, only for some reason it was the shades that fell under a flurry of dirt and negative reviews.
I myself was not enthusiastic about the first two parts, you can see, but so, for general development, to understand that such films are the place to be. The third part even looked with some pleasure. It all ended beautifully, love won, the past in the past. Who doesn’t want this kind of life?
Many write that there is absolutely nothing in the film, for which it is worth spending time on it, but still watch, wait for the release of the last part, write reviews, so still catchy?
Personally, I think that the whole trilogy is worth watching only because it distracts from all the adversity of life, you look at the beautiful life, expensive cars, personal planes, beautiful apartments and houses, chic landscapes, all this is seasoned with good music and even humor. At least an hour and a half in your head there are no problems, just relax.
I am not a fan, I will not recommend it to everyone, but I did not regret watching it myself. This is the dream of all girls, so let dreams come true, no matter what is on TV.
I judge the film by emotion after watching it, but there is nothing to think about, there is no special morality, it does not call us to anything (but not all films should be intellectual). It's a movie for just watching, spending an evening without thinking about anything. The emotions after him were positive, I didn’t want to spit.
Claims to “Fifty shades of freedom” by James Foley, as well as to the entire cycle as a whole, can be presented arbitrarily much, here everyone has his own – but the fundamental for me, perhaps, is that what is happening simply do not believe, so much is what is happening tries to spare your feelings in everything. “Riding fast and hunting stir the heart,” but not in this particular case – in “Shades” this very excitement of the heart is shifted to the farthest positions. There is a lot of sex, but it is so optional and confused, as if it is afraid of you inadvertently to excite, the race with the participation of Audi feels like a rally of pensioners on wheelchairs (and where on the track without a logger, so much so with Destination 2 began), and the final conflict is resolved so quickly that it does not even give a chance to really worry about its participants. It was also in the previous parts, when both a threat to the well-being of the heroes and its neutralization could be missed by simply blinking in time. Even from the “Mexican” plot twists, of which in abundance, the creators failed to extract a dramatic and emotional maximum.
But why the audience’s pulse is still faster, it is from the demonstration of shameless, unbridled... wealth, all these poster images of “factories, newspapers, steamships” and interiors from the category “so that I live.” Interestingly, it is in the third part that one of the plot twists, fanned by the easiest idea of doubleness, allows you to think about how Gray’s money contributes to the substitution of concepts, how the external gloss at the click of your fingers turns in the eyes of the unsociable sadist into a stylish dominant, courageous male, worthy of looking at him more closely.
The third part is more emotional than the previous one (but less intriguing than the first). And she still talks about something – love, respect, changing roles in marriage, coming to terms with past mistakes and current status, the desire to build harmonious relationships, but all this is broken about the lack of empathy, interest in history from everyone involved in it. Dakota Johnson and Jamie Dornan cope with their work, but still get lost in expensive scenery, seem superfluous on this holiday of other people's sexual fantasies.
Logically, it is in the third part of the scandalous "gold" finally crumbles, Dornan removes into the closet not only costumes, but also a shirt (than resembles Jacob from one notorious saga) and is no longer ashamed of his good face, which is why, perhaps, he plays a little better. Perhaps in favor of the approval for the role of Christian, it was Dornan who played just the perception of the story in the future – with a more textured and “evil” actor in the role of Gray, his evolution would look even less plausible.
And yet, in the credits, it is not so easy to find yourself captured by a nostalgic impulse, despite the sentimental clip cutting in the finale – too few memories are associated with this story, scraped on the knee for three years, the smell of commerce and exploitation, even the exploitation of the “twilight” “good name” is too strong. In general, speaking about the eventfulness and emotionality of all the films of the franchise, I want to quote the classic: “And, perhaps, many of the women, looking at this picture, would like to cry, but can not and should laugh”, although “their heart stings yearning.” Although, I must admit, the third part amuses not only its absurdity (although frankly stupid in it is not so much), but also a couple of really successful jokes.
In general, the franchise resembles the same Victorian mansion, which the heroes are going to rebuild in the high-tech style, but are limited to restoration. “This is our future home,” says Anastasia Gray, urging the architect to keep the “less challenging and more respectable” building where she and her husband plan to move, and this is the only but decisive argument that beats all the advantages of modern style with all its economy, steel and panoramic pools. And this dialogue is perhaps much more revealing and metaphorical than it seems at first glance. BDSM, handcuffs and whips, dominants and submissives, contract sex - this is all, of course, shiny spray and intriguing high-tech, but what could be better than the not very modest charm of the bourgeoisie and a tame husband with you under the handle? Because "we have to live with it."